The opposition Democratic Labour Party (DLP) launched a scathing attack on the credibility and integrity of Clyde Mascoll at a political meeting in Deacons Road last night. All the speakers: Derek Alleyne, Richard Sealy, Michael Lashley, David Estwick, Chris Sinckler, culminating with Leader of the Opposition David Thompson spoke with a single purpose, that is, to destroy the credibility of Clyde Mascoll. The attentive crowd, including yours truly, listened with interest to the different speakers who recollected many positions that Clyde Mascoll once held when he was a member of the DLP. Now, he has sought to distance himself in a Barbados Labour Party (BLP) government. The speakers spoke with great emotion at the betrayal that Clyde Mascoll has crossed the floor. Many of them recounted episodes how DLP members including David Thompson recruited Mascoll from his job at the Central Bank where he was very unhappy and they worked to elevate him up the rungs of the party.
The contribution of the night was delivered by David Thompson with the assistance of video aids. Thompson dissected many events which surrounds the creation of a company called Hardwood Factory Housing Incorporated. Thompson in a hard hitting delivery highlighted several wrong doings since the establishment of Hardwood, a company registered in November 2006.
Here are some of the observations made my Thompson to a large Deacons Road crowd:
-
Thompson refuted claims that Anthony Murrell, CEO of Hardwood, has a proven track record of house building in Grenada. Thompson confirmed that he sent someone to Grenada to investigate Murrell’s involvement in house building, and specifically to investigate the claim that Murrell’s had participated in the building of 500 houses in a six month time frame. Thompson to a hushed crowd indicated that Murrell, from all reports, spent a total of 3 weeks in Grenada. The housing project he was known to have been associated terminated his services and he returned home.
-
Details of financial dealings by Hardwood were highlighted. Thompson produced documents which show that vehicles and other equipment currently being used by Hardwood was bought by Murrell using lease financing arrangements from Consolidated Financial Company and Simpsons Motors and NOT Hardwood. (This information was interesting because it was previously reported in the media that in order to save Hardwood money, equipment owned by Murrell is being leased to Hardwood.) Thompson presented copies of documents which showed that Murrell was badly in arrears at Consolidated Finance and Simpsons Motors; the two companies which he entered into the lease financing arrangements to buy the equipment currently being leased to Hardwood. In a nutshell, Murrell has received money from Hardwood, a company 90% owned by Enterprise Growth Fund Limited, for the use of equipment but the same equipment has been acquired by Murrell through lease financing which is in arrears. Thompson asked the question why is the equipment not leased/purchased in the name of Hardwood?
-
Thompson produced a letter signed by Sir Leroy Trotman which highlighted accusations of sexual abuse charges against Murrell. Thompson charged that many of the victims of the abuse are constituents of Mascoll and he had done nothing to respond to their concerns.
-
The Operations Manager of Hardwood, Carol Phillips, wrote to Murrell (CEO) and Hoyos (Chairman) addressing concerns related to jobs which Hardwood was working on, but the accounting for revenues and expenses were not being accurately reflected in the books of the company.
-
Thompson questioned the role of Hardwood in the building of a commercial property, said to be owned by someone very close to a prominent politician in Barbados, and where certain individuals working on the construction of the building are being paid by Hardwood while at the same time they appear to be working illegally in Barbados.
-
Thompson also alleged that Hardwood invoiced Urban Development Commission (UDC) approximately BDS240,000 for foundation work done on seven low income houses in the New Orleans. The UDC through close scrutiny of the invoices was subsequently able to detect that the invoice should have been for approximately BDS129,000.
-
Thompson questioned why only 15 houses have been constructed to date even though the company has drawn down on BDS2 million dollars in under a year. It appears that despite the rush to get to the market with the low income houses there has been a hitch and the houses have not been deployed due to the lack of land to place the houses.
-
Thompson using a video presentation listed 19 bounce cheques which have been issued by Hardwood and which is an indication that despite a BDS2 million capital inflow to the company it continues to experience cash flow problems.
-
Thompson questioned under what circumstances Hardwood was awarded several multi-million housing projects across Barbados despite the company experiencing cash flow problems. Thompson estimates one project has a value of BDS45 million dollars.
-
Thompson questioned Mascoll’s role in the company Hardwood and why he has been the one to speak about the company and not Minister Reginald Farley who is responsible for housing in Barbados. He also touched on the silence of other Ministers concerning the Hardwood issue and Arthur’s recent instruction to Mascoll to respond to a letter written by him (Thompson) to Arthur. In Thompson’s view it is a clear sign that Mascoll is on his own on the issue of Hardwood. Thompson further charged that Mascoll is aware of all that is going on at the company and he should let the public know the extent of his involvement with the Hardwood company.
Thompson refuted Arthur’s claim that he (David Thompson) as Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee had the means to investigate Hardwood. Thompson told the crowd that the PAC could investigate a government owned company ONLY if the audited financial statements of the company were laid before parliament. He ended his delivery by serving an ultimatum to Prime Minister Owen Arthur. He gave Arthur 30 days, starting last night, to start an investigation into Hardwood by a third party upon whom they will mutually agree. If Arthur fails to respond in the 30 day period Thompson will move a no-confidence motion in parliament against Mascoll. He threatened that the no-confidence motion would be preceded by unprecedented political activity led by the DLP never before seen in Barbados.
BU wrote yesterday that the political scene is starting to boil in Barbados. We look forward to hearing the Barbados Labour Party response to the accusations tabled by Thompson. Thompson ended last night by urging Barbadians to buckle their seat belts because they were in for an exciting ride!
Previous Story written by Barbados Free Press:















104 responses so far ↓
Someone In the crowd // October 15, 2007 at 5:52 AM
It was a good meeting. People listened to all the speakers who were focussed on issues. You forgot to mention Chairman Donville Inniss who was biting in his comments as well.
Anonymous // October 15, 2007 at 6:37 AM
Arthur rush hot and sweaty on the People Business on CBC maybe to try to deflect attention from the DLP meeting last night.
Adrian Loveridge // October 15, 2007 at 7:32 AM
All we can hope is that there will be at least one journalist that has the testicular fortitude to ask relevant questions at the Press Meeting Mr Mascoll has caled at 10am this morning.
Four questions I still would like answered:
1) on 9th July 2007, Anthony Murrell, the HHF inc, CEO told the Nation ‘the company HAD acquired several acres of land in Christ Church and St. Peter’.
1) Where is this land and who paid for it at what cost or was Mr Murrell lying?
2) In his Response to the Opposition Leader’s letter published 11th October 2007 in the Advocate, Mr Mascoll stated ‘I was informed that Mr Anthony Murrell is the owner of Vechicles and Equipment which are leased to the company, resulting in a saving of approximately $44,000 PER MONTH in expenditure to the company’.
Exactly what is this equipment and what are the vehicles:
What is the value of them?
What is the lease period?
Are there any balloon or secondary payments due at the end of the lease period?
What interest rate is the lease based on?
3) Why didn’t the company lease the vehicles and equipment?
4) If as Mr Mascoll states in the same response to the Leader of the Opposition, ‘the company’s mandate is to build houses for individuals’, why is it building sports pavillions?
Roger Rabbitt // October 15, 2007 at 8:07 AM
Can’t recall a larger crowd at any political meeting outside of an election. I was impressed with the quality of delivery by every speaker.
I supported the BLP in the past, but not anymore. Was never a member of any party, but I liked what I witnessed last night.
I noticed that there were plenty high ranking bees in the crowd including a prominent woman who was trying her best to disguise by wearing a hair piece and drawing up in a parked vehicle. We had a good laugh.
Back to the issue. Hardwood Housing was exposed for what it is: a scam.
Is there not a financial controller at that company?
How could they be paying a man more money for vehicles than it would cost had they undertaken the lease arrangement themselves?
Never heard such madness. Then again, everything certain people touch seems to turn to copper, if not mud.
anon // October 15, 2007 at 8:42 AM
is “roger rabbitt” and “wishing in vain” not the same person
Adrian Hinds // October 15, 2007 at 9:26 AM
I continue to believe that we will see an election results, that has never been seen before. Mascoll should have heeded good advice from myself and others, not to join the BLP. I continue to wonder what is Mia’s role in all of these things that are undoubtedly doing a great disservice to Owen’s character. David Thompson is set not to disappoint us when he said on taking over the leadership of the DLP, that this will be the mother of all elections. Barbadians are getting closer to realizing that the problem of government unaccountability and corruption is a systemic one, and that only a serious look at, and revamping of our current system of government will make a difference.
james // October 15, 2007 at 9:30 AM
Surely the problem with Hardwood is that it hurts Mascoll more than it hurts Arthur. We all know that Arthur is the real electoral issue – just take a look at the poll statistics – and that he will leave Mascoll hanging. With such a wide range of scandals to choose from, I continue to be bewildered by the DLP strategy. I guess I must just be a little slow to catch on.
Wishing in Vain // October 15, 2007 at 9:49 AM
When have you last seen 10,000 people at a political meeting in Barbados ?
If you wanted to see a crowd of that size you ought to have been at Deacons Farm this evening, I attended and beyond any shadow of doubt this was the largest gathering at any political meeting that I have ever attended and am referring to as far back as 1960’s, it was huge.
The speakers were of a very high standard but in my mind the three that stood out were Dr Estwick, Chris and David Thompson who was at his eloquent best, they dealt with matters as clincially as could be done but it was left to Mr Thompson to deliver the most telling blows to Mascoll.
He addressed the myth that Murrell had built 500 homes in Grenada after the effects of Ivan it was proven that Murrell spent the total sum of 3 weeks in Grenada and built nothing, the video presentations was a new and fascinating addition to the meeting and they were very well delivered, the letters showing Murrell in poccession of all the lease contracts and where he paid $ 25,000.0 to Simpson and Conso and where he onward lease them to HHL at $ 54,000.00 and evidence that they were in arrears to the lenders, also to there was hard evidence that these guyanese workers are working but do not have legal status, he also showed letters showing where the union worte Murrell in connection with his molestation of the 3 members of staff, and his attempt to fire one for not obliging him in his nastiness,
He also addressed the issue of the ongoing work on a commercial building being carried out byHHL members of staff but not collecting and payments for this work the building happens to belong to Mascolls wife (hence Mascoll’s comments that he and his wife would be holding a press conference tommorow)
The meeting was a top class presentation of a very high class.
From the sidelines it certainly appears that there is gross mismanagement and corruption involved in this adventure in closing Mr Thompson clearly stated that he was giving Arthur 30 days to address this issue or he will be moving a no confidence motion against Mascoll my only comment would be he really ought to put the motion for Arthur as well.
My congrats to the leader of the Opposition and his team for delivering the facts pertaining to HARDWOOD HOLDINGS they did it in a most professional manner and in a very clinical manner.
Let me state that what I said was honest and true it was the largest crowd that I have witnessed at a political meeting in years and all the presentations were of a very high standard and quality and yes he the Leader of H M Loyal Opposition the Hon Mr David Thompson brought the meeting to an end in tremendous style with a rousing salvo of shots for Mascoll, this is exactly what the nation needs more of serious investigative work and for it to be put out in the public domain for all go over.
I was indeed impressed by the extent of the information that Mr Thompson has at his disposal and how he delivered this information.
Adrian Hinds // October 15, 2007 at 9:58 AM
james // Oct 15th 2007 at 9:30 am
Surely the problem with Hardwood is that it hurts Mascoll more than it hurts Arthur. We all know that Arthur is the real electoral issue – just take a look at the poll statistics – and that he will leave Mascoll hanging. With such a wide range of scandals to choose from, I continue to be bewildered by the DLP strategy. I guess I must just be a little slow to catch on.
————————————————————
I do not take this leadership thing to seriously, maybe i am dismissive of voting for a Leader since i don’t live in St.Peter or St. John and will never get a chance to vote for the person that is most likely to be selected by the majority of parliamentarians to be the first amongst equals.
I fing it hard to believe that sufficient persons across barbados will place their x for the representative of their choice that appears on their ballot paper, but really meaning to vote for Owen or David. When i go to the polls and i believe that my current representative has been absent without leave or cause from tending to the contituency’s needs then i will vote for the other guy or gal. Owen and David will not be a factor in that decision. I believe that party diehardism is on the decline (voting party no matter what), therefore given the structure of the Ballot where i select one out of two or three names, none of which will state prime minister, or leader, and will not have Owen or David’s name on it, how can someone take this poll to mean that Owen Arthur will be the PM again?
Hypocrite // October 15, 2007 at 9:58 AM
David,
You hypocrite.
Why are you crying crocodile tears for Stephen Alleyne when you worked so hard to kill him with your dirty smear campaigns again him?
It is the classic story of a man who devoted himself to his country, only to be pulled down by slimeballs like Barbados Underground and Barbados Free Press.
Wishing in Vain // October 15, 2007 at 10:02 AM
anon I am Wishing in Vain now and always, but much to your amazement people do share the view that this was a massive meeting with an excellent delivery of the message which was clearly that we have major corruption going on in this island.
How in gods name that a manager can lease the equipment for $ 25,000.00 and then onward lease it to Hardwood for $ 54,000.00 where is the savings to HARDWOOD HOLDINGS ltd in this deal, it was documented and presented on the video last night for all to see.
Adrian Hinds // October 15, 2007 at 10:11 AM
Hypocrite // Oct 15th 2007 at 9:58 am
David,
You hypocrite.
Why are you crying crocodile tears for Stephen Alleyne when you worked so hard to kill him with your dirty smear campaigns again him?
It is the classic story of a man who devoted himself to his country, only to be pulled down by slimeballs like Barbados Underground and Barbados Free Press.
———————————————————
Stephen Alleyne has been exhibting the signs of a person under duresss for sometime now. Sweating profusevely in air condition envoirnments, Speaking as if out of breath etc. I have watch him for sometime during the Legacy unfolding in the Glebe, to his many TV appearances leading up to Worldcup and often remark to my wife that this guy needs to take stock of his lifestyle. It is sad that no one around him didn’t notice these things or did and did not speak up.
Roger Rabbitt // October 15, 2007 at 10:35 AM
Anon
I do not know Wishing in Vain.
There are times when i disagree with him/her and other times when he/she expresses something with which I agree.
That style of writing is completely different from mine. If you were smart enough you would have noticed that.
No, we are not one and the same, thank you.
I am me and he/she is he/she.
Malcolm X // October 15, 2007 at 10:36 AM
Tings heating up, bosie.
Roger Rabbitt // October 15, 2007 at 10:46 AM
Sorry to the lady hiding in the back of the dark colour car last night.
Just learnt that the BLP woman of whom I spoke in my earlier post was not disguising because of party affilliation, but was actually spying on her husband who was supposed to be elsewhere but “found himself” in the presence of his outside woman last night.
Wonder if this will make Pudding and souse.
Roger Rabbitt // October 15, 2007 at 10:47 AM
Need to get back to the serious stuff. Just could not let that one go by, folk.
Wishing in Vain // October 15, 2007 at 10:51 AM
As recent as last night it was clearly stated that all candidates will be expected to sign off on a declaration of their assets and would expect to be investigated before entering the house of assembly and there is a written commitment given by Mr David Thompson in his speech that they intend to put integrity legislation in place before election are held.
Lets move on and address the issuse of corruption and crime, and the lack of the same integrity legislation from the ones with the power to put it in place now but instead they opt to steal and corrupt the nation.
I would suggest a short email to Mr Thompson to inquire of him his intentions, I am sure he would only be to happy to enlighten you.
I am nothing more than an innocent bystander that has a love for my country and a love for what is right honest and fair, I hold no office am not even really in the mainstream of politics but I am hating to witness what is obviously taking place in Barbados with its rape and corruption and have taken the view that something needs to be done about the extent of this corruption and I have decided to vote against it, only one vote it may make no difference at all to the overall outcome of the election result but I will not vote for maintaining your party in power to continue to rape us even more, sadly I have voted in the past for this same party that I intend to vote against, I maybe one of those swing voters but I vote for what I think is good and is right and the blp is not good nor is it right for me this time around maybe after they have a shake up and realise that their stealing must be stopped it will improve.
Wishing in Vain // October 15, 2007 at 10:51 AM
Ok Rabbit so who is stepping out ???????
james // October 15, 2007 at 11:03 AM
WIV, “not even really in mainstream politics”. Give me a break. You are a consummate DLP insider or I’m a purple elephant.
Jason // October 15, 2007 at 11:30 AM
Wishing in Vain, I can’t find this “WRITTEN COMMITMENT” by Thompson. Please post it here with the source so all can look at the whole thing. When will Thompson put integrity legislation in place? You mean before the election 4 years from now or before THIS election?
Why doesn’t the DLP have their integrity legislation all set to go? They have had 2 years to get it together! They should be saying “elect us and we will enact this integrity legislation within 60 days after our election”
THAT would be something. Right now we have more of the same old stuff.
Back to the first topic, Wishing In Vain. YOU SAY that Thompson and the DLP have said all of their intents IN WRITING.
Please cut and paste it here with the references because I can’t find it on either the DLP blog or website.
Post it here!
Wishing in Vain // October 15, 2007 at 11:42 AM
You are a purple elephant, I have only been agitated into being vocal as these issues have been revealed it is disturbing to me.
I have been a supporter of the blp as recently as up to the last election, what does that suggest to you?
I would be the first to declare that the blp were very good in their first two terms in office hence my decision to support them with my vote, however I think that it is clear for all and sundry to see that the corruption that set in during this last term has been grossly done and it is for this very reason that I have decided to become vocal on corruption and dishonesty in public office as it certainly appears that every single project that has been undertaken by this gov’t has had massive cost overruns and the evidence is there to see that the proceeds of these cost overruns end up in the bank accounts of the Bannister’s, Nicholls, Shorey’s and Arthur’s bank accounts.
Wishing in Vain // October 15, 2007 at 11:54 AM
Some how I feel that integrity legislation will be nearer to being real under the DLP certainly it never be seen under this corrupt bunch of bastards that make up the gov’t the blp.
Adrian Hinds // October 15, 2007 at 11:58 AM
All this talk bout leadership, and winning a sampling poll on leadership is nonsesne, when it comes time to vote.
Frankology // October 15, 2007 at 12:04 PM
I did not attend the meeting and I am not a member of either political party. I prefer to be neutral in these funny days since I can criticise both political parties without any repercussions. I have been constant with my comments pertaining to Government’s questionable actions with the Highway Project.
I have been listening, watching and analysing the passion of the Opposition Leader regarding the Hardwood Housing Factory. I mentioned in an earlier post that I do not condone politicians being corrupt or associating with corrupt people. I am asking this question. Is the issue of Hardwood Housing Factory the problem or is it Clyde Mascoll? If it is the former, deal with the statement of 500 houses built in Grenada; deal with monies received from the Growth Fund, deal with the bill of sale for the equipment and who suppose to be the owner; deal with the delay in building the low income houses, but let the emphasis be on the company.
In the other context, if Clyde Mascoll is directly involved in any impropriety, get the substantial facts, ensure that no questionable informations are left behind and let the PAC, which you are the leader, or the police and finally the people decide on Election Day and put him out to dry.
Now, Mr. Thompson. We have endless questionable projects with individual managing these contracts under investigation. We all know about VECO and 3S Structural Steel Solutions LLC commanding hundreds of millions contracts, yet we are not hearing your voice. We know that the company awarded the highway contract never build a single highway or a flyover, we never heard if a general liability insurance is force on the highway; and no one can explain the massive increase in the cost of works. The people are waiting for answers. Your public meeting should have directed at these issues and not dealing with Clyde Mascoll. You are the one who spoke of your intentions.
Your political action resemble when Don Blackman resigned from the Barbados Labour Party joined the Democratic Labour Party and all of his past comrades lambasted him left, right and centre. We all know Bajans have short memories.
In the next 30 days, let me hear about the other problematic projects.
David // October 15, 2007 at 12:16 PM
Frankology~we must urge you to read the BU article carefully. We made the point that David Thompson has declared that the PAC cannot investigate a government owned company until it generates an audited financial statement. Thompson did make the point that he has been able to investigate the company Hardwoods when compared to leader of the opposition as oppose to Chairman of PAC.
The other point which you raise about whether Hardwood is a Mascoll or Hardwood problem, it is both if you accept Thompson’s argument. It will be up to him to prove it in the court of public opinion. His political life depends on it.
Frankology // October 15, 2007 at 12:30 PM
David, I did read the BU article, I know that he can only investigate any improprieties as Chairman of PAC after the due process of going through the usual accounting procedures. What I am suggesting is why he is focusing only on the Hardwood Housing issue only. I read and watch everything that was said for the past few weeks and ninety percent was HARDWOOD. Deal with me as a Critical Analyser and not a BLP or DLP yardfowl.
Anonymous // October 15, 2007 at 12:32 PM
Has there been any word coming out of the press conference which was suppose to be held by Mascoll today at 10am?
David // October 15, 2007 at 12:37 PM
From where we sit David Thompson is the only person who can give you a sniff of what his strategy is or will be. We can only assume that he has a strategy and time will tell if it works. Our view is that he anticipated that the Prime Minister would have called elections by now. However in this Hardwood issue he has a concern about corruption in an area which all Barbadians can easily identify with, that of housing.
Let us see how the BLP responds!
Wishing in Vain // October 15, 2007 at 12:53 PM
Frankology,
Mascoll was dealt with last night and they will be other attacks in due course I am sure VECO THE PRISON, 3S DANOS ROAD WORKS PROJECT.
I think that there is a method of operation involved here lets wait and see it unfold.
Wishing in Vain // October 15, 2007 at 3:07 PM
GEMINI
October 15th, 2007 at 6:47 pm
I work at hardwood housing and everything that David Thompson wrote is true true,workers are treated like garbage,because as murell says he has a big boy backing him.
help us Mr.Prime Minister remember you are the leader of this country,i commend Mr Thompson for speaking out against the injustices that bajan workers are faced with daily.
Someone In the crowd // October 15, 2007 at 3:12 PM
David you also forget that David T is calling his Hardwood crusade OPERATIONS RESTORE GOVERNANCE.
Wishing in Vain // October 15, 2007 at 3:37 PM
I am hearing that the press conference just concluded and Mascoll’s wife told them that she did not want anyone from HARDWOOD HOLDINGS working on her property but Mascoll brought these HARDWOOD WORKERS in to do the work, but of course if the work is free I have no doubt that they were welcomed with open arms.
Reports reaching me state that the meeting did not go well for Mascoll and Hardwood Holdings, he received some surprises during the meeting that seemed to stun him.
I will report if and when I manage to speak to my contact again.
Concerned Citizen // October 15, 2007 at 5:06 PM
It has come to my obsevation that perhaps Mascoll crossed the floor in order to bring about the demise of the BLP and that the biggest instigatior is Thompson. But my PM boy he isnt gonna let himself or his party fall… poor Mascoll the grass isnt green on any side!!!
Bajan // October 15, 2007 at 5:08 PM
HEARD THAT NON NATIONALS WORKING FOR HARD WOOD HOUSING WERE FFIRED TODAY
Democratic to be bone // October 15, 2007 at 7:07 PM
The size of last night’s crowd may suggest that the swing is greater than 5%. I am extremely dissapointed with Mascoll who would have given the people of Barbados the impression that he was a Sunday School boy when he presented JAWS and Greenland. The meeting was very well presented and I wish we could have more dealing with Greenland, the Highway & 3S, the Prison, etc and showing how these over-expenditures and capital projects impact on inflation and the cost of living we are now experiencing. Government is not at the least worry as the greater the cost of services, the more VAT is collected by them to disguise the cash flow incompetencies created by wastage.
Anonymous // October 15, 2007 at 7:16 PM
Already we have seen the crocodile tears of hypocrites like Barbados Underground (and soon to follow Barbados Free Press) following the death of Stephen Alleyne. These are the same people who hid behind the internet for months to wage the dirtiest of smear campaigns against the same man they now pretend to pay tribute to. He dedicated himself to making the hosting of World Cup 2007 a success which all true Bajans are justifiably proud of. No doubt the stress and strain of the vicious attacks and rumour-mongering of hate-filled and small-minded people such as BU and BFP contributed greatly to his health problems. It is the classic tale of national sacrifice… and Stephen Alleyne paid for it with his life.
We at B`F`P`E pay tribute to his legacy of outstanding work and offer our genuine and heart-felt condolences to his family.
As a nation we must ensure that we honour him fittingly.
May his soul rest in peace.
B`F`P`E.
Anonymous // October 15, 2007 at 7:19 PM
Such was the hatred BU held for this Stephen Alleyne that David has cleverly pretended to acknowledge his passing by presenting it in such a way that readers are barred from commenting on it directly, and he furthermore instructs readers to take their condolences elsewhere.
To David the low-minded dog we say…. God don’t like ugly.
Straight talk // October 15, 2007 at 8:27 PM
How can the honest criticism of David and BU take away from Stephen’s management of what his political masters have christened Barbados “finest hour”.
Show some respect BFPE.
curious // October 15, 2007 at 8:36 PM
So
The Press confrence that Mascoll Held today which was to make him look really good ,has done the opposite,Mr Murrell made himself out to be the illiterate jackass that he is,How do you as a CEO of a company that has been expose in the press because of the wicked things that were taking place under his leadership,come out and admit on national television to having cheques written to him personally while he is paying the workers from the accounts of HHFI,MY GOD,this is just so wrong ,does he think that the people of this country are foolish,not all,no wonder he was able to take all of his family to Miami so that they can “shop until they drop ”
Where is the interigty Mr Mascoll ?How can we the tax payers of this country allow this Man to flece a young company out of Goverment funds so that he can benifit ,but then again the board of EGFL cannot even touch him either.
as Anonymous says ..God Don’t like ugly.
oh my gwad // October 15, 2007 at 8:40 PM
Yes the meeting was ram off but I saw too many out of parish plates in passing.
I speculate that ALL the DLP suporters were in Deacons Road.
The crowd was big, but not big enough to change a government.
Too much time spent on insulting Clyde Mascoll.
Silent Watcher // October 15, 2007 at 8:42 PM
All of the Guyanese workers were fired today from Hardwood Housing Factory,
well well well,
not one red cent were given to them, this is just so unfair.
does Mr Murrell thing that these man are Dogs
he better remember what goes around comes around.
Roger Rabbitt // October 15, 2007 at 9:04 PM
Turncoat Clydie was at it again today.
What a pathetic individual is this man. Turncoat Clydie should be ashamed to be talking about integrity.
Clydie, did you learn that word today? It sounded awfully weird coming from your mouth. YOU are the one who has no integrity. How do you feel coming out in support of the very policies you criticised not so long ago? Gems was the worst thing this gov’t did and all of a sudden, it is profitable and now be sold. You were all over the place telling all and sundry how corrupt David Shorey and others were as a result of the inner workings of Gems. What has happened since then? Have you now seen the “light”? My heart weeps for the likes of you. We will deal with you in North West.
Have you done any house to house work? Do you realise that you are not welcome in many many homes out here?
I would like you to replay the tape of the so-called press conference held today so that you can hear how sorrowful you sound.
BTW, Clydie, the same way how you turned your back on us, we , by the grace of God, will do the same to you whenever the bell rings.
The script has been written and you certainly ain’t the star.
Can’t waste anymore time on you, Clydie. You are a spent force and we have really big fish to fry. We have REAL issues to discuss.
Wishing in Vain // October 15, 2007 at 9:40 PM
Anonymous please return to the part of the jungle where the sun does not shine you clown!!
Wishing in Vain // October 15, 2007 at 9:44 PM
I can now confirm that there were 15 NON NATIONAL dismissals at HARDWOOD HOLDINGS today this is after ASSCOLl said they did not employ illegal workers.
Now this should be a crime that someone is charged for employing illegal workers the same as they would do had these been illegal sex workers!!!
Undertaker // October 15, 2007 at 10:02 PM
The Hardwood issue is a strange one, that I am watching closely, if the DLP has more clear evidence they can break Mascoll, and indeed gain more votes/seats. If it is all a bluff and Owen and Mascoll, can show that it is all a bluff then you call elections quickly after when Thompson is still licking his wounds. So this is really the deciding factor. Owen will not take it lying down someone has to take the fall even may be Mascoll. So far it seems like the Hardwood CEO might be the one to suffer, cause some how he seems to be not not bright when it comes to money and business.
Wishing in Vain // October 15, 2007 at 10:13 PM
Murrell is a pawn and ASSCOLL is the player, I personally do not need anything further than what was presented to the public last night he is guilty as charged in my books all of them need investigating for fraud, if TONY HOYOS can be sitting on both boards the lender and the borrower at the same time and knownly lend our taxpaers money to a comany that is obviously being run very poorly where our money is at serious risk of being stolen by people like ASSCOLL and Murrell and others we have questionh to ask of the creditabilty of Hoyos as Chairman and his functioning in that post.
Wishing in Vain // October 15, 2007 at 10:14 PM
While all of this is taking place we have the very Tony Hoyos who is Arthur’s lapdog sitting as Chairman of HWHL and sitting on the board of the EGFL overseeing this level of dishonesty and corruption and not saying a word about how our taxpayers funds are being utilised and stolen.
The 15 workers fired today, the Wife of ASSCOLL saying one thing he ASSCOLL saying something else and Murrell saying something different as well, at least they could have got their script right from before they went on camera, reports reaching me state that one of the reporters nealy fainted when they put him in this hole for this briefing.
Now that ASSCOLL has bungled this attempt to quell this issue , who does he turn to for help?
Certainly not Mottley, Atherley, Rommel Marshall, Liz Thompson,Billie, he has no friends or supporters from within not even MR SEE THRU noticed how they have all left him out to dry, what a bumbling jack as.
No Name // October 16, 2007 at 7:31 AM
There are so many things going on in Barbados that boggles the mind that it is really very difficult to understand or believe how such important Government scandals involving major Government Ministers and local business men/women can remain under wraps. And more appallingly little it seems can be done by way of the Democratic process to compel the BLP to come clean or hold an inquiry/probe to ventilate the concerns of the people.
I know of few Democratic countries in the world where a Democracy can or is allowed to function in this manner without the people demanding accountability.
The next thing that I cannot figure out is, the PM Owen Arthur is the least impacted by all of the scandalous allegations being made against his Government. From my perspective his Ministers come in for more attention than does Arthur who is ultimately reesponsible. The recent poll suggests Arthur is still more popular than is David Thonpson!
Though over the past several months some sections of the Barbados society because of their outspokenness have drawn attention to these scandals they have barely dented the armour of the BLP when it comes to giving the public FACTS to support their allegations.
What I thought was most significant and I have been preaching this for months is, that until the key players of the Barbados society, business sections and Unions get involved the BLP seem to believe they can snub their noses at the ordinary Barbadian.
Case in point. I made a comment about this very fact on the DLP Blog suggesting that the Business community and the Union must speak out and that by not doing so it showed to me anyway that these segments of the Social Partnership were mere lap dogs for the Governments conduct.
A few days later in the Nation News I saw where BAPE took the Government to task over myriad and serious deficiencies they had uncovered involving “Operation Freeflow”. The Government immediately agreed to meet with them.
In the same edition of the Nation News both the Business and Union segments of the Social Partnership said exactly what I had said. And expressed their concerns that their roles had diminished. Government reached out to them too by agreeing to meet.
We need more heavy hitters like BAPE, ALL employers, Unions and the Barbados public to come together as a team to make their voices heard. And to show by actions that they will not allow the BLP or any other Government to rule Barbados as though they are above the law!
The time has come in Barbados that serious change has to be made where legislation is brought in that allows the people and the Opposition Parties to be able to get full transparency about perceived or real corruption within the ranks of the ruling Government.
The thing that makes this so neceesary is this. Take what is going on now between Government, the DLP and the people, involving the many shady contracts and the scandal about Hardwood. All of this because of the late hour may never come to see the light of day before an election is held. Are we not still waiting for the St. Joseph Hospital report?
One does not have to specualate why this BLP Government is playing “hardball” in not coming clean when looking at the many scandalous and outrageous revelations that led to the Glendairy riot and burning of that facility. It is hard to believe that even in a third world Nation like Barbados and involving such an important facility as Glendairy that so many spurious events that could have been easily avoided had this BLP Government been doing its job was allowed to occur with impunity and resulted in the destruction of a prison. None more so than warders having to wait months for pay checks.
But the serious consequences flowing from the Glendairy incident clearly caused by BLP incompetence has cost the Barbados taxpayer $200 or more millions. And the Glendairy fiasco is but the tip of the iceberg. Because if it is true the contracts in dispute involving the ABC highway, Airport etc which are all suspect of corruption and over runs and being built in an inferior way according to BAPE (as in the case of Operation Freeflow) these things too are costing the Bajan taxpayer big time and will continue to as the years go on because of needing pre-mature and extensive maintenance.
But here is Tony Best in todays Nation News suggesting or that is how I read it that a lot of what is being complained about in Barbados is hype by trouble makers. Even allowing that Tony Best is a brown nosing BLP I find his comments insulting to his countrymen and women and not becoming the conduct of a professional reporter.
There is no one easy fix for the serious problems facing the average Barbadian like the high cost of living, not being able to afford housing etc. But it can be fixed as other countries have faced silimar challenges and their Governments have fixed it. The fact of the matter is many in Barbados and the Caribbean region have lived the good life too long exploiting the masses and using propaganda to support it.
Maybe if David Thompson is elected he might want to consider bringing in GENUINE expert advice from overseas to advise him on policies to address the many health, economic and social issues Barbadians have been complaining about for decades and being told there are no solutions to them.
In North America and England there are thousands of high profile, competent and dedicated retired Professionals, Academics and others many of whom I am sure would be happy to give their expertise and in many cases free in helping Thompson go about fixing what the BLP broke. These people would quickly get to the bottom of and finding solutions to the problems.
Many probably would welcome the opportunity and be glad to get away from the winter and help solve the mysteries that so many in Barbados would have us believe cannot be solved.
Wishing in Vain // October 16, 2007 at 10:10 AM
Would you seriously expect anything honest or anti the blp coming from that clown Tony Best?
Bearing in mind that he is putting a shot on the the Billie Miller therefore would you expect any thing different from him?
No Name // October 16, 2007 at 11:40 AM
Wishing in Vain you are correct in what you say. And many using these blogs know what is happening too but regrettably are being frustrated in not being able to do anything about it. Because even the “Mainstream” press in Barbados is indifferent to what the masses are enduring.
I am not so naive as to not to know that ALL Newspapers throughout the world have their political biases and prejuduices, but the Nation News and The Barbados Advocate carry this type of reporting to extremes in favor of the BLP. It has almost reached proportions of media National treason against the people and best interests of Barbados. This is no exaggeration of the situation! Newspapers the world over Barbados excepted respect media “BALANCE” when reporting on their Nations political, economic and social realities. This is dictated by and is a responsibility of a “Democracy” and more importantly a “Free” Press!
And what is even more disgraceful is, that it is the very mainstream Bajan who without their support these newspapers would be nothing that are the ones suffering the greatest social injustices from unconcionable BLP Government practices and policies.
What is also disturbing or it is to me even though it does not impact me personally is this. Nobody seems to care that of a population of 285,000 people thousands of them are not getting the necessities of life that they are entitled to and no one seems to care except a few religious leaders. Some in the Barbados society even lie and play games with peoples heads to try and say that only 13,000 are living in poverty.
Yet the very Minister in charge only a month ago said that he was doing a census because Government did not know the true numbers living in poverty. This is after the Government came to power 10 or so years ago suggesting they would be a Government practising “politics” of inclusion. Lashley too only recently showed concern for poverty in Barbados after the UN gave a scathing attack on the regions performance in this area of social justice. Where were and why were these buffoons not dealing with poverty 10 years ago when elected? I stand to be corrected but I believe it was Minister Prescodd a month ago said the reason he was doing a census to see how many were living in poverty was because the last census done was in 1989. Knowing this why have they waited until 2007 to try and find out how many are living in poverty? Obviously it was not one of their priorities was it?
Newspapers, Government, responsible citizens and others have to take what is going on in Barbados more seriously and realize that things cannot continue to go as they are. There is obvious and serious disparities in the facts of what the more fortunate in Barbados wants us to believe about poverty levels and what those facts really are.
The CADRE poll that was recently undertaken found a huge and lopsided percentage of those polled believing the cost of living in Barbados is too high. When so many people believe this they have to be taken seriously and their concerns are supported by factual evidence that they are telling the truth. You cannot allow lies to prevail over the truth if you want to fix a problem!
What I believe is behind the cost of living problem is this. The vast majority of people working are not being paid realistic wage levels based on the economic realities of the cost of living in Barbados and inflation. There is also no minimum wage and that does not help the situation either when it comes to menial labour.
When one looks at the economic situation of Barbados there certainly are some JUSTIFIABLE factors that might be beyond the control of most that impacts the price of consumere goods. But this is true in ALL countries. Yet in other countries the majority of those holding jobs can live comfortably. They may not all be able to eat filet but they can afford to eat steak. They cannot afford to drive a Mercedes but they can afford to drive a basic Ford, Nissan etc. They cannot live in mansions but they can afford or most of them can to, live in a bungalow, semi detached or Town house. The further out of town they buy the cheaper the real estate and many opt to do that and drive the extra distance to get to work. None or few of these options seem to be available to the majority who have jobs in Barbados.
As I have said before how can you boast as having less than 4% of your population unemployed yet according to the poll about 90% say the cost of living is too high, they cannot afford a house, food and other basic things that are enjoyed by most in other countries? Something just does not add up.
In other countries of the world they cope with raw material increases just as they do in Barbados but it does not cause a chicken to jump in price to $20 and stay there. And I know for a fact that most food items are grossly overpriced and huge profits are being made on them because of that reason. It is a bloody rip-off!
Plus wage earners in other countries get raises close to or at the rate of inflation and some get even bigger raises than that.
I know people living in Canada and on a FIXED income of $70,000 being able to do so debt free, own a house, two cars, eat well, take vacations and need for little. Healthcare is free and for all over 65 so is prescription drugs. All is not perfect but it works to the satisfaction of the majority. Hospital patients do not need dinner bells to call a nurse.
I realize that you cannot compare Barbados realistically to Nations like North America but to those who I talk to looking into the affairs of Barbados all come to the same realistic conclusions. Corruption, greed, lying about the facts or reality of a situation. And most of all trying to make the gullible believe that Barbados is so unique that what works in other Nations cannot and will not work in Barbados is used to justify the situation. It is all crap being perpetrated against a Nation whose major population cannot absorb or understand the BS and lies they are being fed.
What with Globalization, Fair Trade, Free Trade EU agreements etc all of which in the scheme of things are having little impact on the Caribbean and which is being blamed for why the masses must do this and that to better themselves is share propaganda. Decades ago before all of these things came into place the masses were still living in poverty, had high levels of unemployment and the cost of living was high and contiued to be high to this day .
Unless someone is prepared and hopefully David Thompson is that someone, to grasp the bull by the horns and set Barbados on a new path of Social, Governmental and Economic justice nothing is going to change for the majority.
More Scandal For PM! // October 16, 2007 at 12:38 PM
I know that Barbados Free Press reads like News Of The World with every rumour exaggerated ten times, but they linked to a new blog in Miami that is posting legal documents about the Canadian lawsuit where Owen Arthur and Chief Justice Simmons are being sued for fraud.
We were told this was thrown out of court but like half of what we hear that wasn’t the truth.
The Canadian court is starting to hear evidence and this could be the sleeper scandal of the year in Barbados. Not one word in the Nation or Advocate.
http://keltruthblog.com/blog/?p=11
Wishing in Vain // October 16, 2007 at 4:11 PM
Nelson Barbados Group Ltd. has commenced a legal proceeding in Ontario against a group of individuals and companies connected to the Kingsland Estates Ltd. matter, alleging that the actions of these individuals and companies have caused financial loss to the plaintiff.
The defendants are listed below. Every few days, Keltruth Corp. will write an article on a person or business selected from this list. When the article is published the name below will appear in underlined bold text, linked to said article.
Richard Cox
Gerard Cox
Alan Cox
Philip Vernon Nicholls
Eric Ashby Bentham Deane
Owen Basil Keith Deane
David Simmons
Peter Simmons
Elneth Kentish
Glyne Bannister
Glyne B. Bannister
Philip Greaves, A.K.A. Philp Greaves
Gittens Clyde Turney
R. G. Mandeville & Co.
Cottle, Catford & Co.
Keble Worrell Ltd.
Eric Iain Stewart Deane
Estate Of Colin Deane
Lee Deane
Errie Deane
Keith Deane
Malcolm Deane
Lionel Nurse
Leonard Nurse
Edward Bayley
Mark Cummins
Francis Deher
David Shorey
Owen Seymour Arthur
Graham Brown
Brian Edward Turner
G.S. Brown Associates Limited
Golf Barbados Inc.
Kingsland Estates Limited
Classic Investments Limited
Thornbrook International Consultants Inc.
Thornbrook International Inc.
S.B.G. Development Corporation
The Barbados Agricultural Credit Trust Ltd.
Phoenix Artists Management Limited
David C. Shorey And Company
Price Waterhouse Coopers (Barbados)
Marjorie Ilma Knox
First Caribbean International Bank (Barbados) Ltd.
Attorney General Of Barbados
PriceWaterhouseCoopers East Caribbean Firm
David Thompson
G.S.Brown & Associates Ltd.
GBI Golf Barbados Inc.
Estate of Vivian Gordon Lee Deane
Edmund Bayley
Life of Barbados Limited
Owen Gordon Finlay Deane
Veco Corporation
Commonwealth Construction Canada Ltd. and Commonwealth Construction Inc.
Frankology // October 16, 2007 at 4:21 PM
I am amazed of the many cross section of the Barbadian society who are implicated in this case. I can see Bees, Dees, Blacks, Whites and the in-between mentioned in your list. Wonder what’s the inter-connection with these people. I am looking for the finale in 2018.
Wishing in Vain // October 16, 2007 at 4:50 PM
Has anyone visted the blp blog site recently, it appears that they are now accepting the fact that they are a dishonest corrupt bunch because the number of blogs on there are nearly all being negative towards the actions of the party to their credit at least they have taken their licks like a man, Mottley included.
No Name // October 16, 2007 at 7:13 PM
Wishing In Vain I would be frigtened and sh—-te to take you up on your suggestion that I visit the BLP
Blog to confirm that they are less than honest.
Because me and my computer might pick up the mother of all viruses “Arthur, Mascoll and Lynch foot in mouth disease”.
Wishing in Vain // October 16, 2007 at 7:25 PM
No Name, Fear not we have to get pass this fear of these scams and be prepared to speak out and speak loud.
Idealist // October 16, 2007 at 7:30 PM
Mr Allamby:
We recognise your commitment to the land of your birth, but this time, keep your posts decent so we can seriously discuss all the valid points you raise.
I, for one, welcome serious debate.
Please do not lower the tone.
Saint Nick // October 18, 2007 at 1:28 AM
Everyone keeping lotta noise about Asscoll and Urkel, but few looking at EGFL and not seeing the bigger picture. How can EGFL advance $2m of the taxpayers money to Hardwood Housing in such quick time and without much fuss and under whose authority? Simple, it is for hardwood houses to be built on lands recently acquired from Government and certain private interests by some EGFL board members. Maybe Messrs. Thompson et al should look at, (1) the EGFL board lending limit (2) the company (ies) certain board members set up to bring houses to the public and (3)methodology / vestiture used to acquire the lands. Sadly enough, irregardless of whichever party is in power, the little fish because they are not too bright and being dispensible like Urkel are usually shredded and spat out, but the really big fish like Hoyos never get sent to the canning plant. Oh, by the way Tony Best is a reporter trying to convey the impression of a serious journalist. However he is yet to graduate despite being close to his pension. So ignore him.
Wishing in Vain // October 18, 2007 at 8:12 AM
Potent very potent my friend, This is my position exactly, here we have Tony Hoyos sitting on the board of the Lender EGFL while sitting on the board of HARDWOOD HOLDINGS the borrower and overseas this scam but yet not a single question is asked of him , why should this be the case ?
Well more than likely because Tony Hoyos has been installed by Owing Arthur to do a job for him and to filter the money back to him in this rip off, remember Tony Hoyos is very closely associated with Colin Brewer another scamp let us not forget his rein at GAIA where he arranged for the duty free shops to be run by a company that he is involved in, at the serious cost overruns at this same project leaves you to ask why is the connection so close among this lot of gangsters !!!
The truth is they all should be investigated and sent to prison for their role in filtering these funds out of taxpayers accounts to the accounts of a chosen few.
Tony Hoyos as chairman should be the first to be fired but lets watch the actions of the PM will he take action my guess is that he will not due to the fact that everyone is aware of his scams and how he operates therefore he is unable to do anything to correct these worngs in society.
In a nut shell they all know Arthur to be a dishonest crook and he cannot threaten anyone with prison because he to could be an excellent candidate to be an inmate.
Concerned Citizen // October 20, 2007 at 3:41 PM
BU had a look at your poll and it made me go WOW! It would be nice if Peter Wickham could be paid to do a poll by BU :-)
No Name // October 20, 2007 at 4:08 PM
Idealist get a life and stop your self righteous hypocrisy that all on these blogs see you for. Having an ulterior motive—– Jealousy of others who post sense instead of rubbish like you!
Deal with the REAL purveyors of vulgarity against Mr. Loveridge befor talking rubbish to me.
You should know by now people do not take you seriously or your ulterior motive that are obvious even to the village idiot.
You only are making yourself look like the idiot you are when ignoring a man revered on these blogs Adrian Loveridge humilated with vile, vulgar comments that you stood silent on.
Get a life old boy/girl it will make you feel a whole lot better.
Wishing in Vain thank you and I intend to!
No Name // October 20, 2007 at 4:40 PM
Let me ask you to ponder these thoughts. Why are we surprised that Journalist in Barbados are intimidated and afraid to fight the good fight and speak the truth?
Do all on these blogs not say they fear using their names because the Government would have the police kick down their doors?
Do these blogs themslves not get threats of “Men in Black” coming to shut them down?
Is Adrian Loveridge a whiteman trying to enlighten the people not get threats against his life? And humiliated by vulgar insults?
Am I not constantly singled out for attacks of nonsense by “Uncle” Toms and some white folk?
Democracy is not alive and well in Barbados and the BLP rules by fear! Dialogue and debate are not strengths of an oppressive Government. Intimidation is!
When the great and honorable gentleman Peter Morgan was alive did he not say that Arthur intimidated him, did the Emeritus of Journalism Harold Hoyte not say the same thing?
Look at the Nation News it is filled from top to bottom with BLP lackeys, Roxanne Gibbs, Al Gilkes, Mavis Beckles to mention a few. Then look at your other option the Barbados Advocate long known as the “whitemans” voice and run by a phony Christian.
Get real Barbados if you want change!
Fred // October 24, 2007 at 2:58 PM
I have listened to the call in show today and heard some paltry, feable excuses being made for an inept lazy minister of housing and lands mr Farley seems that his ministry is run in nearly the same manner as he runs his office.
His rambling excuse as to why he has done absolutely nothing for the people he represents is a sad statement about his lack of service.
I can sympathise with them as I too have been at the mercy of the same minister for nearly a year now with little or no forward movement on my issue, maybe I too need to place a full page advert in connection with my problem and only then will he get kicked into action, the real problem is that none of this crop of politicians really give a damn because their pockets are overflowing from their past 14 years of taking from us.
David // October 27, 2007 at 4:44 AM
Posted by WIV to the wrong area:
For those that did not make it to Deacons road for that massive political meeting here is the recording of it for you, enjoy it.
http://www.dlpbarbados.org/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=160&Itemid=2
http://www.dlpbarbados.org/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=161&Itemid=2
Hardwood // October 27, 2007 at 8:36 AM
Good link and powerful evidence !
Wishing in Vain // October 27, 2007 at 9:21 AM
Thank you David thank you Hardwood, and people say that Mr Thompson attacked a private citizen this cannot be the case at all he destroyed himself by his dishonest and nasty actions both financially where he least equipment at half the price that he onward leased it to HARDWOOD HOLDINGS for and his moral corruption of assulting and molesting the young ladies the he employed.
Wishing in Vain // October 28, 2007 at 1:14 AM
http://www.nationnews.com/story/301431211340765.php
A woman is said to be at the centre of the Opposition party’s focus on Clyde Mascoll and Hardwood Housing Factory.
This was revealed yesterday at the Barbados Labour Party’s (BLP)
annual general conference, during
an unscheduled speech by Mascoll, Minister of State in the Prime Minister’s Office.
While Mascoll was not listed among the speakers on the agenda, Deputy Prime Minister Mia Mottley asked for him to be given privilege to speak on the controversial issue after she charged that a non-national woman who was employed at Hardwood.
Now you know what is so funny about this situation it is that this is the same woman that Murrell is charged with molesting and assaulting, does she not have reason to complain?
She did not run to the DLP she wrote a letter to the Chairman TONY HOYOS outlining the position of HARDWOOD HOLDINGS and how it was being manhandled and raped by Murrell to which he said and did nothing, now if he Hoyos was installed there as a caretaker of the funds of EGFL why then did he allow this slackness to continue unabated?
There are many more issues attached to HARDWOOD HOLDINGS that ASSCOLL will not care to address and no amount a ranting at a blp convention to a blp audience will change the fact that fraud and corruption has taken place there and continues to take place there.
It certainly appears to me an outsider that ASSCOLL has alienated himself from the rest of those within the blp and from his comments in this matter he seems to be trying to buy Mottleys attention, too little too late ASSCOLL in your greed you forgot good manners and honesty and you will pay the price for your dishonesty.
David // October 28, 2007 at 1:55 AM
There is obviously something about the Hardwoods Project which merits further investigation. This is not to say that Mascoll has done anything wrong, maybe he just got too close to the transaction in his zeal to produce an idea for housing which would position him well in the minds of the electorate and more importantly his mentor.
Just a thought!
Wishing in Vain // October 28, 2007 at 11:34 AM
David not something about HARDWOOD HOLDINGS everything about it from its Chairman all the way down for if he was installed there to see after the $ 2 million input from EGFL then he too has sadly failed at his job when Murrell can lease equipment and then onward lease it for double the lease cost to HARDWOOD HOLDINGS it is a disgraceful act and all of them neens to be investigated for fraud I know that there is already a case for sexual abuse but fraud is my other concern as this is obviously what is taking place there. Using our taxpayers monies, Do you think that we will every recover a $ 1 million of the $ 2 million that EGFL has invested there ?
I say never.
Wishing in Vain // October 29, 2007 at 2:00 AM
Example of fraud and dishonesty abound with ASSCOLL.
Instance # 1 ASSCOLL response to the question of illegal workers from Guyana first he said they had no such workers but by Tuesday after the press conference they fire 15 of them this is yet another example of a major warping of the truth.
Instance # 2 Murrell lease the equipment to save the company money when as we have see the lease figure from the loaner companies was half of that, was asked of HARDWOOD HOLDINGS to pay he paid $ 26,000.00 Hardwood paid $ 54,000.00 explain where there is a savings in this arrangement to HARDWOOD ?
Instance # 3 When asked about the work being carried out at ASSCOLLS wife’s office at Perry Gap Murrell states that he had workmen working there and he received payment for work cheques from Mrs ASSCOLL which he signed over to HARDWOOD HOLDINGS is this not compelling evidence that ASSCOLL really did have HARWOOD HOLDINGS workers working on his site in a private capacity?
Instance # 4 ASSCOLL claims that Murrell built 500 homes in Grenada ASSCOLLS reply it does not matter one way or the other if they built 500 homes or they built none, now why would he make such a claim knowing it to be a blatant lie and an untruth?
No-Confidence Motion Looms; Current Leader Of The Opposition David Thompson To Face Off Against The Former Leader Of The Opposition And Current Minister Of State, Clyde Mascoll « // November 7, 2007 at 10:10 AM
[...] motion in Clyde Mascoll which he issued at a political meeting in Deacons on October 14, 2007 – read our story. In another BU story we introduced the idea that Thompson and his Opposition should have used the [...]
David // November 16, 2007 at 2:34 PM
No comment on Bobby Khan as CEO of Hardwoods? According to reports Murrell has been demoted to the position of Technical Manager. Is the demotion because of a lack of competence or …?
Frankology // November 16, 2007 at 2:47 PM
David, this is not really a demotion, this is placing someone in their rightful position. We have all realised that Mr. Murrell was not really the person to deal with administrative or financial dealings with the company. This is positive re-structuring.
Concerned Citizen // November 16, 2007 at 3:01 PM
Frankology are you serious? Call it what you like he now reports to Khan.
Jerome Hinds // November 16, 2007 at 3:28 PM
Frankology // November 16, 2007 at 2:47 pm
David, this is not really a demotion, this is placing someone in their rightful position. We have all realised that Mr. Murrell was not really the person to deal with administrative or financial dealings with the company. This is positive re-structuring.
*************************************
Frankology,
What’s positive about this ?
To keep in your employ a NITWICK & FEMALE MOLESTER ?
Frankology…..You really do not know the meaning of NEUTRALITY !
Frankology // November 16, 2007 at 3:48 PM
Do you want me to be arrogant with an agenda. I am dealing with the facts, not perceived innuendos from everything I see and hear. Everybody do not have the same intelligence otherwise we will be killing one another, and let’s wait for law courts to deal with the molesting case. We need to be fair with our statements.
Jerome Hinds // November 16, 2007 at 4:44 PM
Frankology…….Perceived innuendos ?
What is it…..you want the DLP & David Thompson to ask questions about VECO….based on Press Reports ?
Yet when the Local Press….reports and produces photographs about Anthony Murrell of Hardwood Inc. being brought before the courts on sexual harrassment charges……you shout PERCEIVED INNUENDOS !
That’s arrogant LUDICRITY on your part……frankology !
Frankology…..You really do not know the meaning of NEUTRALITY !
Frankology // November 16, 2007 at 4:54 PM
Wow J.H, It seems that I am hitting a nerve.
NEUTRALITY from someone from a neutral philosophy is different to NEUTRALITY from someone with a political agenda. You want me to sing your tune, but I have no voice to sing. So except my humming.
Jerome Hinds // November 17, 2007 at 1:50 PM
Frankology,
You can never sing my tune !
You have been commandeered to play a part !
However, ” neutral ” you claim it to be !
Frankology // November 17, 2007 at 2:34 PM
Jerome we have our job letters so next move on.
With LIAT taking over from Caribbean Star, the clouds seems to be blocking these stars and now we are hearing that the Williams are complaining of poor service and now plan to purchase their own airplane. It was said that it is a small plane, but we need to know the distance it can fly. I wonder if it is really LIAT, because Caribbean Airlines, the old BWIA still flies, along with other Caribbean airlines, yet we are hearing of them purchasing an aircraft. Remember, the bajan oil mogul has his own jet.
Wishing in Vain // November 17, 2007 at 2:44 PM
Oil Mogul has two aircraft and is currently looking into a third one my friend.
Wishing in Vain // November 17, 2007 at 6:13 PM
November 17, 2007
THE BLP HAS PLACED BARBADOS ON THE MORAL BACK BURNER
THE QUESTION OF INTEGRITY in public life assumes greater significance later this month as the no-confidence motion against Clyde Mascoll is brought by the Democratic Labour Party (DLP). There are few in Barbados who are not now familiar with the story of Harwood Housing Factory Inc.
This is a company that, before David Thompson publicly raised the matter a month ago, no one knew was owned by the Government of Barbados. How the Government could form a company with significant public funds without the public knowing, is an indication of the arrogance and lack of transparency of this Government led by Owen Arthur. The public has a right to know when Government takes up their money and invests it in over 95 per cent of the equity of a private entity.
The saga that continued since the company was established under the chairmanship and wise counsel of Mr Teddy Griffith, who was subsequently and mysteriously no longer on the board after March, is unbelievable.
Poor corporate decision-making, bad management decisions and doubtful financial dealings led to it being practically insolvent by August. In other words, in less than a year, and with $2 million of taxpayers’ money at its disposal, the company could not meet its obligations.
Furthermore, after being given $2 million, there are hardly ten houses that the company can show as having been built by it. But we, the goodly people of this country, were told that the other partner in Hardwood was a successful contractor who had successfully built over 500 houses in six months in Grenada. The truth of that assertion is yet to be established. But that was the basis on which we were led to believe the public should have its confidence in the company.
The staff of Hardwood worked in fear of negative practices and that led to the intervention of Sir Roy Trotman, general secretary of the Barbados Workers’ Union, and he was forced to write to Mr Tony Hoyos – chairman of Hardwood, member of the board of the Enterprise Growth Fund Limited, member of the board of Barbados National Bank, member of the board of the Caribbean Broadcasting Corporation and one of the owners of the new company to which the Government is giving Crop-Over. Wow!
Mariano Browne, the chairman of Enterprise Growth Fund Limited and the defendant in a major civil action in Barbados by the former owners of Caribbean Commercial Bank Limited, is now the Minister of State in the Ministry of Finance in Trinidad and Tobago. That takes care of that.
But there is more . . . . There is a crying need for the introduction of integrity legislation in Barbados and, were it possible, it should be back-dated to cover the establishment of the Pan African Commission and the political deal – with certain former DLP/NDP/every-other-party operatives, involved at that time. There is need for an investigation into the St Peter Development Fund as well. And the Friends of St Michael West Central. And much, much more.
Frankology // November 17, 2007 at 6:38 PM
WIV, why the one-man show regarding Hardwood. Every post you are repeating yourselves with no alternatives or any planned investigations of the more serious problems within society. Since this is the silly season, I am only seeing politicians from both camps looking at things that were in the public domain for years. All of a sudden PR is the thing.
What have me confused is the Cheapside Market. This market was opened in the 1990’s, not a word was murmured by the opposition regarding vendors refusing to occupy the market, yet they are bona fide tenants that prefer to ply their trade from the outside. That is a fact. Reason, customers prefer to drive and buy, and are accommodated by vendors who preferred to occupy the rat infected gutters in the car park and be happy due to a faster dollar. What about the health aspect of customers, who would have known if any rats scampered across these make-shift stalls. Now lets look inside at the vendor’s space, around ninety spaces and just a few committed vendors remain inside. That is the problem, so when David visit the market on the slowest day, alas, he had something to talk about. Why did the entourage not visit the market any Saturday during rush hours. This is what makes me mad.
Wishing in Vain // November 18, 2007 at 2:14 AM
Frankology as much as I would like to consider your submissions childish and immature I know that you are neither but I beg you to mature in your assessment of life here in Barbados.
Do you think that the Rastaman that was pictured in the paper was complaining because of the one day in the week that business was slow? grow up man and give me a break from your stupidity he was complaining because life there has been in a depressed state for some while now.
The day Mr Thompson visited just reinforced the point my friend nothing less nothing more I hate to knock the wind out of your sails but you are way too trivial on this matter.
Wishing in Vain // November 18, 2007 at 2:22 AM
Frankology , I am sure that you and your party will find HARDWOOD HOUSING a hard one to swallow but rest assured it will get the attention it is so deserving of.
The others such as DANOS, 3S, Road Works, VECO, the PRISON, Greenland, The Baths, the Newton unfinished building,the Airport will all get the attention that they have all earned and desire in the fullnest of time. Trust me they will not get neglected.
Wishing in Vain // November 19, 2007 at 12:55 AM
The weakest link: Christ Church
Published on: 11/18/07.
by HAROLD HOYTE
ALL EYES WILL BE on the Christ Church results in the upcoming general election. It could hold one of the keys to the final outcome.
In examining electoral chances for the two major political parties in our imminent general election, and commencing with the ruling Barbados Labour Party (BLP) this week, I will choose their weakest link: Christ Church.
For the purpose of finally assessing the chances of parties, I have arbitrarily divided Barbados’ 30 ridings into five determining groups: St Michael – 11 (all ten St Michael seats, including Bridgetown); Christ Church – 5 (all its seats); East – 4 (St Philip’s three plus St John); West Central – 6 (St Thomas, St James’ three and St George’s two); and North – 4 (St Lucy, St Peter, St Andrew and St Joseph).
Statistically weaker
In my view, while the BLP is statistically weaker in Christ Church and the East than in other parts of the nation, I categorise Christ Church as more vulnerable because the parish’s five ridings are homophonous, and in their similarity, a unit that may be vital in the outcome of a close election.
So what’s the unprepossessing picture the current Christ Church scene paints for the BLP?
I base my view jointly on the previous size of the BLP’s majorities, in the Christ Church constituencies they won in 2003, coupled with the margin of swing that would be required for them to fall to the Democratic Labour Party (DLP).
Other factors exist which are capable of affecting results, such as candidate changes on either side, as well as the quality of current representation. But those are not matters which should be measured or quantified for determining ultimate seat security at this time, however prudently undertaken.
There is no better rationale than that offered by CADRES (Caribbean Development Research Services) pollster and commentator Peter Wickham, when in February this year he wrote:
“The issue of seat safety is not a static concept, nor is it an entirely statistical enterprise. Seat safety is evolutionary and related to several factors arising from the human desire to keep or replace representatives. Though all human behaviour is subject to change in peculiar circumstances, scientific analysis can normally derive likely human behaviour and it is on such assumptions that swing analyses heavily rely.”
It is on the exclusive basis of a projected swing that I proceed.
The voting record shows that the 2003 Christ Church election successes for the BLP (Christ Church West excepted) were very narrow, representing a decline in support.
Even in Christ Church West, which remains the safest BLP seat in all Christ Church, the DLP’s Peter Barrow increased his tally by 512 votes, while Dr William Duguid (BLP) received 330 less than Sir Henry Forde did in 1999.
Battleground seats
See how the BLP majority margins have fallen, between 1999 and 2003:
East from 812 to 322.
East Central from 1 175 to -280.
West Central from 873 to 391.
South from 883 to 59.
West from 2026 to 1 184.
Of the four Christ Church seats won by the BLP in the 2003 general election, three of them fall among so-called “battleground seats”, in that the margin of victory was within the five per cent swing needed by the DLP to wrest the Government from the BLP.
They are:
Christ Church South where Jerome Walcott’s win over John Boyce was by one per cent.
Christ Church East where Reginald Farley’s victory over Dennis Lowe was by three per cent.
And in Christ Church West Central, where Joe Edghill’s margin over Lawrence Clarke was five per cent.
Rematches
There will be rematches in two of the three contests. Only Christ Church West Central has BLP incumbent Edghill taking on a new DLP candidate in Stephen Lashley.
The other two area ridings were won handily by Christ Church West’s Duguid of the BLP over the Dems’ Barrow by a large margin of 1 184, and conversely in East Central where the DLP’s Ronald Jones beat the Bees’ Rudy Grant by 280 votes, in a massive swing that saw late-entrant Grant throw away what had been a 1 400-vote majority.
This time Jones will be facing a new BLP candidate in Tyrone Lovell, while Duguid goes up against DLP newcomer Taan Abed.
A major weakness for the BLP lies in the fact that Duguid, its strongest candidate, doesn’t have the driving dynamism of a Henry Forde or a “Bree” St John to give impetus to the party’s Christ Church platform punch.
Indeed, the BLP’s two more experienced Christ Church candidates, Reginald Farley (East) and Joe Edghill (West Central), bring neither the necessary credentials nor the type of record to ignite the BLP torch of success for others in Christ Church. If 2003’s numbers are anything to go by, both candidates will be fighting for their own survival.
Clearly the halcyon days of BLP control of Christ Church, when it carried all five seats to the House of Assembly, are over.
At the start of the heyday of Sir Henry and Sir Harold in 1991, the DLP was able to have a presence. Then it held three seats to the BLP’s two, but fell away badly as the power of the two politico knights secured wins throughout Christ Church both in 1994 and 1999 for newcomers like Duncan Carter (East Central), Edghill (West Central) and Wendell Callender and then Reginald Farley (East).
From the bottom of the pit in 1994, the DLP began the climb back.
Moved steadily up
Its growth between ‘94 and ‘99 was nine per cent; then 15 per cent between 1999 and 2003. Its gross take of Christ Church votes moved steadily up, from 8 189 in 1994, to 8 895 in 1999 (at a time when the DLP was decimated) to 10 238 in 2003.
That is by no means to imply that the BLP did not also record growth, because between the 1999 and 2003 elections, the BLP increase also accrued by 15 per cent.
But in the last election, the DLP could have earned two more Christ Church seats if they had earned an additional 380 votes spread between South and East, or 450 votes spread between South and West Central.
In 2008 the BLP’s greatest Christ Church hope will be in West (Duguid), and its toughest fight will be in South against John Boyce (DLP), making his fourth attempt to win the seat. He is, statistically, the Dems’ best bet, if voters can be made to feel that after so many tries, he can at last be a winner.
Dr Walcott is struggling with only a one per cent margin to play with. In order to beat Boyce, he will be required to reverse the swing by six per cent. That will require surgical precision in the campaign operation.
Should be history
The DLP’s next shot will be for East where Reginald Farley staved off a strong effort by Dennis Lowe in 2003. With a current five per cent swing against the BLP, all things being equal, Farley should be history in the next election.
Edghill in West Central has won all his previous battles, although not spectacularly; but he too is within numerical range of being shot down.
So the challenge for the BLP in the hustings is to do its utmost best to repeat these three 2003 marginal victories in Christ Church.
Since statistics indicate that only Duguid is within the range of safety, the BLP’s challenge will be to pull back the three seats it stands to lose from among the Christ Church Five.
Otherwise it will be required to create compensating wins elsewhere in order to retain its majority.
The possible loss of this chunk of its Christ Church power-link spells trouble for the BLP.
Wishing in Vain // November 19, 2007 at 8:39 AM
IT’S ON!
THE MUCH ANTICIPATED no-confidence motion against Minister of State Clyde Mascoll over the Hardwood Factory issue will be tabled in Parliament tomorrow.
Opposition Leader David Thompson made the announcement last night at a Democratic Labour Party mass meeting in Fitts Village, St James.
And to a roar of approval from those who turned up for the meeting, he further announced his intention to table a resolution on integrity legislation, freedom of information legislation and an amendment to the Defamation Act.
“I promised earlier this week that I would draft the motion and put it before the people of Barbados, before tabling it in the Parliament of Barbados,” he said before reading the text of the draft to the crowd.
He added: “I do not expect anything earth-shattering to come from the actual debate in Parliament. There are 24 of them and six of us.
“But the bringing of a motion of no-confidence is one of many weapons at the disposal of the Leader of the Opposition and I will utilise my option to ventilate the issue relating to Hardwood Housing through the medium of a vote of no-confidence on the floor of Parliament.”
Hardwood Factory Inc, a company promoted by Government as the answer to low-income housing, came under intense public scrutiny six weeks ago when Thompson called for a probe into its financial operations.
Then, at a DLP mass meeting last month, he gave Government 30 days to investigate the company, failing which he would bring a no-confidence motion against Mascoll on the ground that he was aware of the operations at the company.
He acknowledged that the Opposition did not have the numbers in Parliament to win the no-confidence motion, but said the wider issue of “transparency and accountability will be highlighted”.
In this way, he added “the people of Barbados will get an opportunity to see how public funds can be misused”.
As far as the proposed integrity legislation is concerned, Thompson said that in order to “facilitate accountability and eradicate corruption”, there should be a requirement for the declaration of assets by ministers of Government and public officials.
Wishing in Vain // November 19, 2007 at 11:23 AM
I went and I heard a great series of presentations by a number of speakers and unlike the blp meetings that I have attended in the past where the PM tries to deliver speeches blind drunk, none of the DLP speakers were drunk but the atmosphere was intoxicating they delivered one telling blow after the other they addressed the cost of living as Mr. Thompson stated the two sentences that Owing dedicated to the subject in his most recent budget, clearly stated to me that when he delivered his budget he did not consider the cost of living to be an issue, it is only after the DLP and the nation has cried out so loudly about it that these clowns have taken it onboard and dabbled with attempted solutions none of which are meaningful.
To me the moment of the night was revealed in the motion to proceed with the No Confidence motion against ASSCOLL and the motion to update the Defamation of Character act along with the moving of an act for Integrity of Legislation in
Barbados.
I trust that this progressive forward looking step will meet with the approval of the cabinet of Barbados and be allowed to pass into law these changes.
The Motion of No Confidence will be an opportunity to fully explain to the citizens of Barbados the various relationships that existed within the setup that was HARDWOOD HOUSING, the rape, the fraud, the mismanagement, the shared directorship of Chairman of HHL Hoyos, and his directorship on the EGFL, ASSCOLLS close involvement in the day to day operation of HHL, the use of HHL workers at his wifes building site, the hire of a number of illegal workers even having stated that there were none there,the question of the LIE that ASSCOLL based his decision to jump into bed with HHL on and that LIE was decided to help this person who had constructed 500 homes in Grenada after the Ivan, when he actually never did anything not a single houise was built by Murrell in Grenada if ASSCOLL did not know this to be the case at the time then he ought to have researched it fully before committing $ 2 million of our taxpayers dollars to a doomed venture, where Murrell can lease equipment for $ 26,000.00 and then forwad lease it to HHL for $ 56,000.00 according to ASSCOLL to save HHL $ 44,000.00 a month in lease payments, he is the financial mind here but if this is his finance ability he better call back Gearbox and reincarnate him and give him the job as this seems very warped to me, there are many questions to ask, many questions for the blp to lie on.
Wishing in Vain // November 19, 2007 at 5:26 PM
Simply put I would like the DLP to tell Owing that he is a coward simple and plain.
Why has he chosen to run from the debates since the budget because he is a coward,a debate on a serious matter that affects the credit unions he entrust this to a liar a thief and a clown to manage.
This just about sums up the state of affairs in this island, everything is on autopilot and the boat is adrift heading no where with no Captain and actually no 1st mate either.
Frankology // November 19, 2007 at 7:02 PM
WIV, I am sick of every post, you are posting the same information. That does nothing for the blogs, but creates doubts of the seriousness of these blogs.
Even if I try to quote a simple paragraph from a previous post, I am informed and my post will not go through, yet, you are able to post the same information on several blogs. This needs looking into by BFP.
Wishing in Vain // November 19, 2007 at 7:12 PM
You obviously have issues with life my friend, I will continue to post once given the strength and the energy, once I do not break the rules of the blogs you will see me, I will be your worst nightmare, mainly because you are unhappy that I do not tow the same line as you.
Thank god we do not all see life with the same outllok if we did it would be one boring world.
PS by the way the Motion of No Confidence is with you, and will your PM not be such a coward but show up in the house for the debate or will he allow ASSCOLL to face the music as a loner?
Frankology // November 19, 2007 at 7:48 PM
You have been other countries worst nightmare, and the dawning of the day changed all of that. I do have a poor and happy life, filled with great expectations and none is for any political party. Everything is for the people being trampled by the elitist, the liars, the thieves, the arrogant writers, the hypocrites and people with high agendas that fail to reason.
Anyway, unlike you, I have been bashing Bees, Dees, and the I-would-like-to-be’s. I have been constantly bashing the ruling party with the Cost of Living, I have been bashing the Government about the massive wastage on the ill-conceived flyovers, the Prisons, the BOLT agreements etc. etc. I dealt with issues, not personalities, I dealt finally with the Vaucluse issue, not because of the wealth of the developers, but the main ingredient within the bloggers statement leaves a lot to be desire, and until I get the real facts, where I can show my venom, I will remain a grass snake. You on the other hand prefer to deal with any sort of information, just to get at the Government. That, I will never join with you. So if you thing I have issues. Enjoy your feelings.
You speak of towing the line, my neutrality will not permit me to be political bias, unlike you, it is impossible for you to deal with a simple issue without being politically blind. Be like the other DLP writers, deal with issues.
By the way, the only blog you have not shown your colours is the Keltruth blog, because two influential party members are included in the charges. Am I lie?
Wishing in Vain // November 19, 2007 at 8:00 PM
I am glad you asked yes you are a liar,
Remember your threat to reveal what you were supposed to know when you knew absolutely nothing? that sticks in my mind as act the suggested that when things do not pan out as you want them to you bluff.
I will deal with what ever I choose to address and no amount of your rantings will affect that, I have notice a manner about your post that are arrogant and in some cases dishonest in nature and that I do not tolerate well.
Remember the post below?
Am I wrong Senor Goodenough? Or you want me disclose to the public your ultimate motive.
So you are still waiting concrete evidence with information regarding a feud/vendetta between these two wealthy St. Thomas residents? This I am still awaiting.
Nevertheless you opt to threaten the writer by stating Am I wrong Senor Goodenough? Or you want me disclose to the public your ultimate motive.
To DISCLOSE TO THE PUBLIC WHAT? and when?
If you are still seeking or looking for this evidence how can you threaten to disclose something you do not have?
That was simply my point you issued threats that were uncalled for!!!
With regard to the Keltruth blog this is of little substance to me or to most of those listed on her site, actually do you know that property is being sold as we speak? So how tied up could it really be ?
David // November 20, 2007 at 9:47 AM
There are many who feel that Thompson is making a mistake going after Mascoll who is a political comyuh! Some feel he should be going after Mottley, Arthur or one of the big fish. Time will tell the error of his ways.
The question still stand why would Mascoll seek to engage in corrupt behaviour with a 2 million project when he has input to projects with millions and millions of dollars.
Some say that Mascoll’s only folly is his desire to make a difference but in the process made several blunders. It does not mean that he is guilty of corruption.
The personal vendetta must stop between Mascoll and Thompson
Wishing in Vain // November 20, 2007 at 10:43 AM
David this is but only one line of attack that is being persued there is a plan of others I am sure.
More importantly despite all of the hot air coming for Mottley and company of what or what not they will do, I am now hearing on the radio that 5 minutes after the start of the proceedings in the house Mottley said that there is some unfinished business to which they need to attend to and the house was adjourned 5 minutes after it was convened,
It is an insult to the people of Barbados, they the ruling party have had a week to attend to matters of the peoples business but wait until the house is called to order to adjourn and get their act together, it would suggest to me they are not ready for the motion and are in some degree of disorder.
They also have to contend with the unknown in that they do not know which of their members will vote with the opposition on this score, my bet would be a vote coming from Hammy Lashley, Rommel Mashall being two that may vote with the opposition if for no other reason but being a moral stand point.
Saint Nick // December 5, 2007 at 9:58 PM
Things are really at a sad state in this country. To place B. Khan at Hardwood is to jump from the frying pan into the fire. If the DLP thinks that Asscoll, Urkel and those at EGFL committed financial improprieties they haven’t seen anything yet. Just wait till B.Khan get’s there. The taxpayers monies will soon be under threat. A discrete query to Fedex to those in the know will reveal everything. The question that arises is why couldn’t a qualified average homegrown Barbadian be chosen for the job? Maybe he/she does not run in those circles.
Observing // December 5, 2007 at 11:24 PM
discrete query to fedex??? care to hint a little more there santa?
Leviticus // December 6, 2007 at 6:33 AM
I am not interested in character assasination but I know this would eventually be raised. I like facts much as Mascoll’s defenders don’t. That is a pity because they are not helping him at all.
I give this information to Mascoll for what its worth: The man’s real name is not B Khan. Check the immigration files. He was declared a prohibited immigrant many years ago and deported for having a firearm and one DLP candidate, I am sure, knows all about it.
He then married a Bajan and got his papers.
Why are the hard-working honest citizens who can never rise top being treated so badly in our country? We have no sense of morality or integrity anymore.
Saint Nick // December 10, 2007 at 10:48 AM
to Observing:
There is a bigger picture here that is not being seen and like great magicians what is being shown is purely an illusion.
Dismissal from Fedex and reasons were clear. If Fedex headquarters were willing to go public with the facts(though very doubtful) then Leviticus would not have to mention things like character assasination. But there is no need to go down that road since B’Khan, B’Lynch, T’Hoyos, L’Hunte and others (whose various business connections are there before our very eyes and if we look closer we see who finances what and who sits on boards ) are all in the same crowd as buddies and shall therefore all go down together, but not before the taxpayers’ monies, all political , business and social connections have been exhausted for their benefit and ironically a small benefit for others, like those few who will hopefully receive houses through Hardwood.
Velzo // December 10, 2007 at 12:02 PM
When I saw Hoyos and Khan together in my paper this morning, I really had to smile. This is what Barbados has come to under Owen “Son-of-a-shopkeeper” Arthur. I have to hang my head in shame, shame, shame.
Wishing in Vain // December 10, 2007 at 12:46 PM
Velzo,
I have been saying for somewhile now that Owing and his gang of crooks are up for purchase by the highest bidder, this explains the rampage of the foreigners running the events along the West Coast and the lack of ability for he and his gang to say no to any of their request to rape this island.
Seeing he has just about screwed up all other sources of gaining foreign exchange he now has to go cap in hand to the wealthy west coast gang and give them whatever they want in permissions because the inflows of foreign currency will dry up and his problems with explode into a disaster zone if does not do as they request.
Saint Nick // December 14, 2007 at 8:38 AM
All that has to be done is look at the ties that bind. Like the hip bone connected to knee bone, etc,etc. Example, BNB Inc . does some financing of Hardwood, L’Hunt is Mg. Dir. of BNB Inc., T’Hoyos sits on BNB Inc. and Hardwood, pals with L’Hunt who in turn is pals with B’Lynch, R’Grant and it goes on.
This a serious group of bright, qualified individuals in this country who were appointed to positions of authority, trust and influence by this Gov’t, ranging from Tourism to Banking to domestic business to politics.
They operate under the OPM principal, in this case the taxpayers monies, in others, the Banks’, exercise their influence at Board levels, (eg:- taxi men complaining about getting work in the Port, but guess who owns the big Tour Busses that get all the work? Is it not a former Board member who happens to be one of this serious group of individuals?)
Then guess who finances the Bus purchases.
ing together from
Saint Nick // December 15, 2007 at 11:17 AM
(sorry about that)
Con’t.
working together from within to form alliances that promote self interest first and foremost, anything or anybody, fellow countrymen, Barbados, are way down the line.
To people who say that the philosophies of both parties are the same, all they need do is take a look and they will see the glaring differences.
Politicians and associates will steal, but never in the history of governance in Barbados has there been the widespread manoeuvering of persons because of political patronage for gain, (a la civil service), kickbacks, mis-management of taxpayers monies, blatant association with international crooks and the list goes on.
Philosophically, B’s are about all of them getting filthy rich at any cost and at the expense of people. Sadly enough, majority of their own rank and file don’t even get a crumb, but only bask in the knowledge that they know Mr. A or Mr.B in the party and somehow this seems satisfying.
D’s on the other hand, some of them will get rich, most will be comfortable, but the beauty is that the spread or gain is much greater reaching as far down as the rank and file.
As an example, which side has provided more housing solutions for middle and lower people to live in comfortably. Then ask yourself, is there anyone or individual from said side that has managed to provide the most housing, who has attained fabulous wealth from housing solution efforts and on the backs of ordinary Bajans?
On the other side, Hardwood hasn’t gotten off the ground properly, yet we are already seeing financial malfeasance. This is just one of the many examples out there.
Barbados Parliament + Politicians = Rum Shop « Barbados Underground (BU) - bringing the news to the people // March 19, 2008 at 6:40 AM
[...] of parliament Ismael Roett during the Hardwood no-confidence motion. Much has already been said and written about whether the Barbados Labour Party (BLP) controlled parliament was partisan throughout the [...]