Barack Obama’s Run For POTUS

Barack ObamaThe most popular discussion around the water cooler, lunch rooms, talk shows and in the blogosphere is the Barack Obama run for President of the United States of America. Many Barbadians are in awe that a Black man in the year 2008 could be challenging for the presidency. Last week, we heard talk show host David Ellis admonished callers who dared to doubt that the Black Obama has a legitimate shot at going all the way. We understand the generalization offered by David Ellis to support his argument at the time that Barbadians are a doubting people. However, the surreal experience which has overwhelmed Barbadians, and dare we say, Black people around the world is a phenomenon to behold. Unlike David Ellis, we can understand why Barbadians could be lulled into thinking that a Black man who is running for the presidency of the USA in 2008 on a anti-Washington and anti-insider platform would doubt a positive outcome.

Our friends over at Barbados Free Press (BFP) wrote a blog last week with the headline, President Barack Obama Would Destroy Barbados Offshore Banking Industry – He Said So!. We understand the thrust of their argument but we don’t agree. To understand why Obama co-sponsored legislation in the US Senate:

Obama and Levin identified us here in Barbados as an “Offshore Secrecy Jurisdiction.” And they were adamant that their law will shut down our international business program. Obama wants all that business done in the United States where he can collect taxes. Mr. Obama’s called us an oasis for abusive tax havens and tax shelters and the emphasis of his bill was to shut down the services, banking and businesses that we provide to offshore investors. He wants to declare these activities illegal and put a stop to them.

We should accept that Obama is an American first who is working to rollout legislation which protect the interest of Americans. The recognition that the United States of America has now become a debtor nation in the world has heightened concern in their legislature about the need to curb the outflow of capital to places they have termed ‘tax havens’. The excess capital which the USA government would have ignored in the old days when they were sitting on a thriving economy is long gone. Of course the mind-set of Obama and other legislators in the USA is also being influenced by the strategy of the 30 richest countries dubbed the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) of which the USA is a member. It is no secret that the OECD has embraced a strategy of ‘combating international tax evasion by promoting transparency and exchange of information both within and outside the OECD’. The fact that the Barbados authority feels that its offshore legislation does not encourage tax avoidance by US companies is of little comfort to US legislators, who are reacting to stem the flow of capital outflows rather than the plight of politically insignificant states like Barbados.

petreus

Related Links

Obama Supporter In Mega-Inspirational Interview

Barack Obama Is The One

Why Can’t Oprah Winfrey Support The Barack Obama Campaign?

Barack Obama’s Journey Continues ~ Iowa Caucus Victory Speech

David Thompson Suffering From Barack Obama Sickness

Getting back to the doubting Barbadians. Obama is currently being compared to a former President of the United States, John F Kennedy. He was assassinated. He is also being compared to the late civil rights leader Martin Luther King. He was assassinated also. The fear by many is that Obama is currently walking a path which extremists in the USA have shown that they are prepared to resist. The big question is whether the landscape of the USA has changed enough to stomach a Black man running for President. The reality is that Obama like Tiger Woods cannot hide from his Black heritage. However, the ability of Obama to capture the Presidency of the United States can only be accomplished by a broad based support from Whites, Blacks, Hispanics and others.

The quiet hope by countries like Barbados is that Obama will co-op the existing political machinery to go all the way. Then and only then will he respond to the expectations of the developed world by departing from the traditional foreign policy of the United States. The problem with this thinking maybe that the USA has developed visible and invisible institutions which exercise more influence on the governance system in the USA than one man ever can.

44 Responses to Barack Obama’s Run For POTUS

  1. We watched a very interesting documentary on one of the channels recently which highlighted the intrigue and clandistine manuverings by the power brokers in the Bush administration leading up to the Iraq war and even in the post war situation. The sidelining of Rice and Power as the expense of Rumsfeld, Tenet and Cheney was a revelation. It begs the question how can rice continue to function given her dismal role as National Security Advisor during that period. In fact we can question why Powell is still a Republic after the huniiation which he had to endure when he delivered the now famous fabricated speech. This is recommended viewing for all those who are naive in the ways of world politics.

  2. Green Monkey

    Colin Powell has a record going back to his days in Vietnam of not being a boat rocker and being willing to provide cover for his bosses.

    Behind Colin Powell’s Legend — My Lai

    By Robert Parry & Norman Solomon

    SNIP

    By late 1968, Powell had jumped over more senior officers into the important post of G-3, chief of operations for division commander, Maj. Gen. Charles Gettys, at Chu Lai. Powell had been “picked by Gen. Gettys over several lieutenant colonels for the G-3 job itself, making me the only major filling that role in Vietnam,” Powell wrote in his memoirs.

    But a test soon confronted Maj. Powell. A letter had been written by a young specialist fourth class named Tom Glen, who had served in an Americal mortar platoon and was nearing the end of his Army tour. In a letter to Gen. Creighton Abrams, the commander of all U.S. forces in Vietnam, Glen accused the Americal division of routine brutality against civilians. Glen’s letter was forwarded to the Americal headquarters at Chu Lai where it landed on Maj. Powell’s desk.

    “The average GI’s attitude toward and treatment of the Vietnamese people all too often is a complete denial of all our country is attempting to accomplish in the realm of human relations,” Glen wrote. “Far beyond merely dismissing the Vietnamese as ‘slopes’ or ‘gooks,’ in both deed and thought, too many American soldiers seem to discount their very humanity; and with this attitude inflict upon the Vietnamese citizenry humiliations, both psychological and physical, that can have only a debilitating effect upon efforts to unify the people in loyalty to the Saigon government, particularly when such acts are carried out at unit levels and thereby acquire the aspect of sanctioned policy.”

    Glen’s letter contended that many Vietnamese were fleeing from Americans who “for mere pleasure, fire indiscriminately into Vietnamese homes and without provocation or justification shoot at the people themselves.” Gratuitous cruelty was also being inflicted on Viet Cong suspects, Glen reported.

    Fired with an emotionalism that belies unconscionable hatred, and armed with a vocabulary consisting of ‘You VC,’ soldiers commonly ‘interrogate’ by means of torture that has been presented as the particular habit of the enemy. Severe beatings and torture at knife point are usual means of questioning captives or of convincing a suspect that he is, indeed, a Viet Cong…

    SNIP

    The letter’s troubling allegations were not well received at Americal headquarters. Maj. Powell undertook the assignment to review Glen’s letter, but did so without questioning Glen or assigning anyone else to talk with him. Powell simply accepted a claim from Glen’s superior officer that Glen was not close enough to the front lines to know what he was writing about, an assertion Glen denies.

    After that cursory investigation, Powell drafted a response on Dec. 13, 1968. He admitted to no pattern of wrongdoing. Powell claimed that U.S. soldiers in Vietnam were taught to treat Vietnamese courteously and respectfully. The Americal troops also had gone through an hour-long course on how to treat prisoners of war under the Geneva Conventions, Powell noted.

    “There may be isolated cases of mistreatment of civilians and POWs,” Powell wrote in 1968. But “this by no means reflects the general attitude throughout the Division.” Indeed, Powell’s memo faulted Glen for not complaining earlier and for failing to be more specific in his letter.

    Powell reported back exactly what his superiors wanted to hear. “In direct refutation of this [Glen's] portrayal,” Powell concluded, “is the fact that relations between Americal soldiers and the Vietnamese people are excellent.”

    Powell’s findings, of course, were false. But it would take another Americal hero, an infantryman named Ron Ridenhour, to piece together the truth about the atrocity at My Lai. After returning to the United States, Ridenhour interviewed Americal comrades who had participated in the massacre.

    http://www.consortiumnews.com/archive/colin3.html

  3. Straight talk

    Adrian:

    Contrary to your understanding that there isn’t much of a possibility of him reentering politics, Gore went on record recently stating that there was only one job, the presiency, which would entice him back to politics.

    As to no possibility, what would happen, in your opinion, if say a hundred super-delegates withheld their support from Clinton and Obama?

  4. Green Monkey

    David, if the documentary on the Iraq war you are referring to in your post above is the one from “Frontline” on PBS, former CIA analyst Ray McGovern wrote a review on it and was not impressed. He felt it did not go far enough.

    Too Timid, Too Little and Too Late

    Frontline’s War

    By RAY McGOVERN
    Former CIA Analyst

    Frontline’s “Bush’s War” on PBS Monday and Tuesday evening was a nicely put-together rehash of the top players’ trickery that led to the attack on Iraq, together with the power-grabbing, back-stabbing, and limitless incompetence of the occupation.

    Except for an inside-the-beltway tidbit here and there-for example, about how the pitiable secretary of state Colin Powell had to suffer so many indignities at the hands of other type-A hard chargers, Frontline added little to the discussion. Notably missing was any allusion to the unconscionable role the Fourth Estate adopted as indiscriminate cheerleader for the home team; nor was there any mention that the invasion was a serious violation of international law. But those omissions, I suppose, should have come as no surprise.

    Nor was it a surprise that any viewer hoping for insight into why Cheney and Bush were so eager to attack Iraq was left with very thin gruel. It was more infotainment, bereft of substantive discussion of the whys and wherefores of what in my view is the most disastrous foreign policy move in our nation’s history.

    Continued at:
    http://www.counterpunch.com/mcgovern03262008.html

  5. Adrian Hinds

    Straight talk // March 31, 2008 at 8:21 pm

    Adrian:

    Contrary to your understanding that there isn’t much of a possibility of him reentering politics, Gore went on record recently stating that there was only one job, the presiency, which would entice him back to politics.

    As to no possibility, what would happen, in your opinion, if say a hundred super-delegates withheld their support from Clinton and Obama?
    =================================

    I don’t know what the DNC rules call for, in such a case, but i would guess that from your scenario that the remainder 700 super-delegates votes would count, bu whatever the empasse that you may conjur up to possibly occur with in the Halls of the DNC will not stop the November national election, and if John McCain appears on the Ballot without a Democratic contender, and there isn’t a “write in” candidate gathering more votes than him, then the Electorial college will have no other choice than to rubber stamp the will of the people.

    There is nothing within the rules of the DNC that produce a Democratic Presidential contender name Al Gore at this very late stage. Without a Legal challenge, and with super delegates enforcing the will of caucuas, democratic primary voters, and elected delegates, Barack will emerge as the nominee. He will then go on to lose in the national election. He won the democratic primaries and caucuses in majority republican states.

  6. Straight talk

    Adrian,

    Thanks for your take on it.

    Che sera sera.

  7. Green Monkey

    Who would Martin Luther King support for president today?

    By Weldon Burger

    I ask who among our current-day political leaders Martin Luther King might support; the more appropriate question is who among them would have the courage to embrace a living King as eagerly as they drape themselves in the dead one’s memory. I’m drawing a blank.

    Much of the commentary on the anniversary of King’s assassination focuses upon the direction he took in the last years of his life, speaking out against the Vietnam war specifically and state-sponsored violence in general, and attempting to broaden the movement that coalesced around him to include economically oppressed people of every color, not just the racially oppressed ones for whom he advocated so powerfully. He wanted to recast the political and social values of the country to the benefit not just of the disenfranchised here, but for those abroad who suffered from our own and similar military and corporate depredations.

    Among the leading presidential contenders, only John Edwards brought even a fraction of King’s outrage and conscience to bear on the economic inequalities that continue to plague and, in many ways, cripple the US. None of the candidates show any sign of feeling the grief and rage King would have felt at what we have done and continue doing to the people of Iraq: hundreds of thousands dead, millions displaced, millions more robbed of fathers and mothers and sisters and brothers, many millions more robbed of their livelihood, their security and any semblance of a normal life.

    Can anyone imagine Martin Luther King failing to address the debt we’ve incurred to the Iraqis? or failing to note the uses to which the hundreds of billions of US dollars and tens of thousands of US lives thrown away on the occupation could have been put? or failing to speak out in the strongest possible terms against US policies of kidnapping, torture and perpetual detention beyond the rule of law?

    And now, can you imagine Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama embracing what King would have to say? (Never mind John McCain …)

    http://smirkingchimp.com/thread/13883

  8. Some will always walk in the shadows of great men, but in their foot steps “never” but perhaps we ask too much of others, there are only a few great men, that is why they are great.

    Perhaps the great man Dr. Martin Luther King would embrace one who could honestly say he/she was about:

    “…No we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down the waters and righteousness like a mighty stream”…

    Dr. Martin Luther King
    August 28, 1963

  9. History will indelibly record the courage which MLK would have demonstrated for nearly eleven years in his civil rights struggle. No many mortals would commit their lifes to such a life of struggle using unconventional means to do so i.e.non-violence.

    John McCain and other leading law makers in the US should be called to account for initially opposing the national posthumous recognition bestowed on MLK. Seems opportunistic that McCain would want to jump on the band wagon at this stage. This is a man who knew that he was doomed to die at any minute. The thought of it increases the respect we have for what the man has achieve in such a short time of life.

  10. Green Monkey

    Martin Luther King? Who dah was?

    Coleen Rowley: “…Just Denounce the Pacifists for Lack of Patriotism…”

    How uncanny that exactly 40 years after Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated during the Vietnam War (and some think possibly because of his opposition to the Vietnam War), we would turn on our radios to hear a Twin Cities radio host re-applying the principles of Hermann Goering to plans for the upcoming anti-war march on the Republican National Convention (RNC). If you listen (here), you won’t hear anything resembling “Minnesota Nice” on Chris Baker’s show yesterday, the program that comes on before Rush Limbaugh’s. His vitriolic, denouncing rants came in bursts between interviews with a Minneapolis Assistant Police Chief and Minneapolis Police Federation President John Delmonico as to how the right-wing radio host “can’t stand these protesting varmints”, “these spitting, frothing at the mouth lunatics”, including his opinion that “protesting is an industry funded by billionaires and communist organizations (and) they are well coordinated and incredibly dangerous.”

    Baker’s tirades were sparked by a Star Tribune newspaper article that reported apparent disagreements between Minneapolis police officials as to whether police officers patrolling at the time of the Republican National Convention in St. Paul should be armed with riot helmets, chemical spray and Taser guns for use on protesters.

    The radio talk host demonstrated little effort to engage in legitimate debate on these issues and soon transcended from merely disparaging remarks to something far worse, coming very close to, if not crossing the line, of basically inciting violence against those he called the “stinky protesters.”

    After Delmonico agreed that “one of the (protesters’) main missions is destruction,” Baker added, “You must have order, you cannot have a civilized society without order and if that means cracking a few skulls, so be it…a good ole boy network is what you need and hand out some ax handles.”

    The absolutely worst tirade, however, comes towards the end of the program after the interviews with the police, when KTLK host Chris Baker lets go with this ostensible incitement to violence: “So we’ve been talking about police protection during the upcoming convention when all those stinky protesters are coming. There seems to be a big debate over whether or not police officers will be able to wear helmets, carry shields, use pepper spray and tasers on this crowd. You know, I’ll tell you what works on a crowd like this–a machine gun, that always works very well.”

    “Mow ‘em down, baby!” excitedly adds Baker’s co-host “Jordan”.

    http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=3113201&mesg_id=3113201

    In case anyone doesn’t get the reference in the title, “just deonounce the pacificst for lack of patriotism”. It refers to a post-war statement by Nazi Luftwaffe chief and Hitler henchman Herman Goering to a French author, Gustave Gilbert, as Goering explained how easy it was to get a country’s population onside for a war.

    Goering: “Oh, that is all well and good, but, voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”

    http://www.snopes.com/quotes/goering.asp

  11. David // April 6, 2008 at 7:34 am

    History will indelibly record the courage which MLK would have demonstrated for nearly eleven years in his civil rights struggle. No many mortals would commit their lifes to such a life of struggle using unconventional means to do so i.e.non-violence.

    John McCain and other leading law makers in the US should be called to account for initially opposing the national posthumous recognition bestowed on MLK. Seems opportunistic that McCain would want to jump on the band wagon at this stage. This is a man who knew that he was doomed to die at any minute. The thought of it increases the respect we have for what the man has achieve in such a short time of life.
    =================================

    A politician being opportunistic, wuh David you seem surprise. Are you still wondering why Hillary keeps telling lie after lie? Landing in Bosnia under fire, wanting to join the Marines at some point in her life, etc. These three candidates are extremly poor candidates, and as such i expect Ralph Nader to gain his highest number of votes ever, come November. :D

  12. Green Monkey

    John McCain and other leading law makers in the US should be called to account for initially opposing the national posthumous recognition bestowed on MLK. Seems opportunistic that McCain would want to jump on the band wagon at this stage. This is a man who knew that he was doomed to die at any minute. The thought of it increases the respect we have for what the man has achieve in such a short time of life.

    If Martin Luther King were alive today, you can be sure that most if not all the prominent politicians and commentators who, now that he is dead, sing his praises and make fine speeches about him and his movement would at best avoid associating with him and at worst probably call for him to be locked up and interrogated at Guantanamo.

    If you have a high speed connection, watch this unedited video of a Fox reporter interviewing a Catholic priest who was defending Obama’s pastor Rev. Wright on camera. About the last 30 seconds is the best part when the reporter tries to compare Rev. Wright negatively to Martin Luther King. The Catholic father really lets the Fox guy have it as he enlightens him as to what Martin Luther King stood for in his life and how in his death his memory has been sanitized by the media and politicians to avoid dealing with the entirety of his message.

    http://www.foxnews.com/video2/video08.html?videoId=1fd1c0cf-5c80-4d75-996f-bd53b2461ae0&sMPlaylistID=

  13. What MIXED race? Obama Is a black man. Most of us bajans who call ourselves black are tainted with european blood.

  14. Maxine Cadogan

    All Obama is trying to do is to see. If he can help the younth people of this country and the old people, becuse things over past years. Has go down hill for many of the poor people, and he sadden to what happing in the USA. With the jobs, Health care and social security. And the wealth people is rich. And as for Ted the senior of Mass my prays go out him we need people like him around for the people I hop he will get over his cancre problem , and be back on his feet because the people need a good man like him for the people in the senate.

BU welcomes your comments: comments on the site do not always reflect the views of BU.  For more information checkout our Comments Policy at the top of the page. If you see an error report it, include a link to the story.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s