http://www.nevisblog.com/?p=3901

You all speak as if you were there at the crime scene…. Be careful of how you judge! Remember They crucified JESUS too….was not he innocent???

You would not STONE a tree if it did not have fruits…..

PS. Trust no man….everyone has to give an account for their own life before God….

Sometime it means that the person is mad.

Sometime it means that the person has suffered brain damage from manyyears of abusing drugs.

Rarely is the voice the voice of God.

The answer is no.

Jippy Doyle does not have any degree at all from any accredited or chartered college or university.

Therefore any piece of paper which he has is worth nothing.

This business of calling himself Dr. is so that he can deceive foolish people, especially foolish women.

Jippy Doyle dropped out or was sent home from St. George Secondary school without a single CXC to his name, and he has earned none since then.

He has earned no other academic credentials either.

Jippy Doyle is an egotistical, crack-head, high school drop out.

Who has spent many years deceiving people, instead of earning his living by the sweat of his own brow and the labour of his own hands.

Please note tht one of Jippy’s principal witnesses, Colleen Belle, a so-called counsellor at his church has admitted under oath that she has twice been charged with criminal deception, once for signing a cheque for $13,000

By her own evidence under oath Colleen Belle admitted that the notes on the “file on the girl” were sometimes written days after she (Colleen) had “counselled” her and that neither the girl nor her mother witnessed or signed these notes at the time they were written.

Let me inform you of one thing , jippy doyle or any other person professing to be a PROPHET, does not have to go to a university to become a prophet, the prophetic is a gift from God no one has to do schooling for it, it is a gift of insight that one has and the ability to hear the voice of God and speak what he is saying either by word of knowlege, discernment, visions or audibility of voice, no university or length of time spent in it can really teach you the voice of God your relationship with God and time spent in his presence praying and seeking him teaches you his voice..

ACCUSED TESTIFY … Jury hears final arguments in ‘Hitman’ trial
Wednesday June 11 2008

by Saju Ng’alla

The four men accused of the murder of a Saddler’s man were yesterday allowed to tell the jury their respective sides of the story.

“I would have never been in such a plan to kill Magilla,” Ruedeney ‘Denney’ Williams said. He and Sheldon “Hatcher” Isaac, Romeo “Buncum” Cannonier, and Louis “Tooloo” Gardener claimed they had nothing to do with the shooting murder of Gavin “Magilla” Gilbert on the 21 March, 2005.

The prosecution team feels however, the evidence linking the four men to the murder is very strong. The High Court trial started last week at the Sir Lee Moore Judicial Complex with the prosecution planning to call more than 20 witnesses to give testimony.

Yesterday, the team, led by Richard Cheltenham of Barbados, brought its case to an end, allowing the jury to finally hear from the four accused.

We can’t believe that the Jippy Doyle case has been held up in the Barbados Courts for 7 years because of all kinds of excuses offered by Sir Richard, yet we read today that Cheltenham is leading a big defense of a case in one of the other Caribbean islands. Interestingly this case started up in 2005 with is well after the Jippy case.

Should the Chief Justice disciplice Sir Richard?

My apologies. Indeed I mis-understood you. I see now that we are as they say, “on the same page”.

The only way he can be a victim is if there was a beef between him and the girl’s family and this is their way to get back at him. (it has been known to happen) If that were the case I would think that he would want to have the matter taken care of speedily……. seven years……. somehow I do not think that is the case.

It is true other important events can sometimes intervene, but if this continues repeatedly. The judge/magistrate can deduce that counsel are not taking the directions of the court seriously.

He/she could then direct that court papers are marked accordingly and advise counsel that at the next hearing the case will proceed…regardless.

There is also the issue of “wasted cost” in that court time is being taken up unnecessarily…with the subsequent knock on effect. These cost can be levied against those seen at fault for the delay.

If it is that this case is seen as so important, that no other person in the partnership can deal with it…or qualified to do so. Then one wonders why it is pushed to the back of important business to be dealt with.

I do not know the full details of the case. However, the point made by another contributor eg, the age of the alleged victim at the time of the offence. Then a young lady confident and perhaps poised in the witness box are different situations.

The jury will have to exercise a great deal of mental dexterity, to arrive at a just decision in those circumstances.

NB: That a “minor” could “consent” to have a sexual relationship with a grown man in a position of trust…does not warrant any discussion.

If Jippy believes that he has been raped or otherwise vistimized then he should immediately go to the police and give a statement and I am sure that the police will arrest the alledged rapist. He should also immediately go to his doctor and be tested and treated for any sexually transmitted diseases including HIV.

It does not matter whether the girl wanted the thing that Jippy has (or had, since he is old now and may no longer have it) or not. Minors cannot consent to sexual intercourse, so even if she had sworn an affidavit before ten judes asking Jippy to have sex with her he would still be wrong. A minor CANNOT consent. The law protects minor children, both girls and boys for a very good reason. The Bible tells us that foolishness is bound up in the heart of a child. It is because children are foolish that the law offers them special protections. This is the same reason also that minors cannot sign contracts. So no minor can go to Courts or DaCosta Mannings or any other store and sign a hire purchase contract for anything, no minor can go to Simpson’s Motors and take a car on credit. Even if they signed a piece of paper in front of witnesses the contract would still be null and void. So this foolish business that we hear all the time that the girl wanted it and therefore the man did nothing wrong and is not guilty is moral and legal foolishness. You ought to be ashamed of yourself. A big man like you should know better.