Submitted by Yardbroom
Some commenters – on Barbados Underground – have asked, why is a certain Minister in the media so often…and to what purpose? Dare I say it – and I could be wrong – perhaps it is to do with face recognition, name recall and authority-association.
In order for someone to like you, it helps if they know you, you are respected, and they see in you what they aspire to, or they admire your personal achievements and ideals. The thinking to my humble mind, goes like this. Who will be our major opponents in the future, how can we combat them. Preparation is always the key. We, therefore have to match them at every turn. Situations will be seen like for like – although they will not be – we must have more and better to offer.
You could say the election is years away and there is a lot of work to be done “now.” All true, but the prudent Party is in it for the long haul, it wants the opposition to have a long wait, before regaining power. Of course I could be very wrong indeed, and my theory could be all at sea, but I offer that scenario to you as a thinking exercise. If it is that a certain Minister is being positioned as a counterweight in the minds of the electorate – either inadvertenly or on purpose – to another figure, interesting times are ahead.
In issues of this kind it sometimes helps to state a “personal position.” The reader can then make an honest judgment, as to if there is some bias in what you have written. I have never said or written a “personal” negative word about the individuals to whom I refer, not even during the heat of the last election. I do not know any of the players personally, have not had a job from them or through them, neither do I want one. Neither do I seek wealth or a position.
I am just an ordinary Bajan boy making a comment on the blogs…I am one of the “common people”.













66 responses so far ↓
David // July 5, 2008 at 6:29 AM
Yardbroom your contribution brings a dramatic twist to the issue around whether Suckoo is being over-exposed in our media. Your idea is so deep that it made us go ummmmm.
Yardbroom the English language is a beautiful language where vaugue words and phrases can be twisted to compare with others more direct in their rhetoric :-). We couldn’t resist!
We look forward to a good discussion on this issue from our knowing political pundits.
Tony Hall // July 5, 2008 at 7:34 AM
Not to get off the subject but in today’s Nation businessman Chris McHale is shown being escorted by a police officer to be taken to CPS for processing. He was charged with occasioning
bodily harm. It is an arrestable offence. Notice that he is not handcuffed. I can guarantee that if he were of a different ilk the cuffs would have been on. The more things change the more they remain the same.
Barbados Election 2013: Mottley vs Dr. Byer-Suckoo? « Barbados Free Press // July 5, 2008 at 9:22 AM
[...] See Barbados Underground’s The Planning of an Election Campaign [...]
Wishing In Vain // July 5, 2008 at 9:47 AM
Tony Hall,
It appears to me that we maybe dealing with an ERRANT BUSINESSMAN and not an ERRANT SCHOOL TEACHER.
Quite honestly this person Mc Hale his relationships always turn sour with his partners, many say his breakup with partner from the Ship days Howard Palmer was like a boyfriend girlfriend breakup now I am not suggesting any sexual motive but what I will also say is that he has never ever been married.
Each venture he has entered into has ended in a disaster for one or both parties.
This only adds to the ongoing list events that he has screwed up, this building project has been filled with issues from the day it started and this is the final straw that broke the Camels back
Carson C. cadogan // July 5, 2008 at 10:05 AM
Suckoo is a far better alternative to Mia Mottley.
Wonderful woman.
me // July 5, 2008 at 10:09 AM
Im trying to follow you here… are you trying to say that Esther Byer Suckoo is being positioned as a countrepoint to Mia Mottley. Suckoo traditional values famliy woman vs Mia ’s perceived non traditional views….
Lets me honest what has Esther Byer Suckoo done, said, worked on that even puts her in the same league as Mia…?
David // July 5, 2008 at 10:30 AM
@me
Some people were saying similar things about Obama. As they say and what ever happens the rest is history.
Wishing In Vain // July 5, 2008 at 10:32 AM
For one she has never abused or assualted ones of her same sex for sexual satisfaction as m has done to many of her likings, the case of her beating Carol into submission and finally beating her to the point of having to be admitted into the QEH is a well documented case in point.
We are dealing with a LADY versus a ROGUE and besides when compared to each other Esther is Petite and attractive mottley on the other hand looks more like an over grown elephant, in speech when Esther opens her mouth you get exactly what you expect from this female a lovely FEMALE beautiful voice however when the blubber opens her trap it comes over more like a crass male than anything else, leaving many to wonder even more is it male is it female.
This beauty and brains versus crass and emptyness, remember her escapades at Culture, Education, As AG she did muich talking but left each Ministry worst off for wear at her departure, she is all long talk but NO ACTION unless women are involved.
SAD BUT TRUE A FRAUD TO THE PEOPLES WORK.
Wishing In Vain // July 5, 2008 at 10:51 AM
I really have no issue with that my boy, sometimes there is no easy way to say that mottley was a poor excuse for a minister or that she is a violent woman beater.
After all I must give our friend Walcott something to gripe and whine about.
The scout // July 5, 2008 at 10:55 AM
Tony Hall.
Did you really expect them to put cuffs on that man’s hands? Don’t you realise he’s white? The cuffs would leave a mark on his hands and he could sue. Poor fellow; they should never arrest a white man in b’dos and put it in the newspaper too! somebody is going to get charged or fired. It seem to be taking people long to see that only blacks can get cuffed. Suckoo is the doorway for indians into more active politics and Mia got a lot of black clouds over she head. One just as bad as the other but in different ways. God help we!
reality check // July 5, 2008 at 11:01 AM
While I would not choose to use the words WIV has to describe MIA—she is all about power to the exclusion of basic human rights and in particular,
womens rights.
Essentially the comparison of the two politicians is correct.
Wishing In Vain // July 5, 2008 at 12:03 PM
Now this is what I call good positive progressive action, good work to all those involved , well done to them for their forward thinking approach.
Budget via sign language for the first time
FOR the first time since the presentation of the Financial Statement and Budgetary Proposals (The Budget) in Parliament has been broadcast live, persons with a hearing disability will be able to comprehend the proceedings on television.
Come Monday, July 7, and the following day, Tuesday, July 8, Government will provide live coverage of the Prime Ministers presentation and the reply by the Leader of the Opposition, respectively, through a sign language interpreter. The presentations and sign language interpretation will be done simultaneously through picture in picture (PIP) display.
Deputy President of The Senate, Senator Kerry-Ann Ifill, who has been instrumental in getting The Budget televised via sign language, said it would represent another step towards a more inclusive Barbados. One that recognises that all citizens have a vested interest in our successes and the challenges we face.
It would also ensure that the hearing impaired have access to an important national debate and are not disadvantaged because of their challenge or language barrier, she added.
The Budget presentation will commence at 4:30 p.m. on Monday, with the ensuing debate continuing on Tuesday, July 8, and Wednesday, July 9. It will also be carried live on radio.
Wishing In Vain // July 5, 2008 at 12:20 PM
The CORRUPTION WILL STOP.
It sure is that is why there is so much uneasyness among the BLP higher ups as the crabs are crawling out with every rock that is moved here recently, the revelations just on Stanton Alleyne alone are amazing, then we have HARDWOOD HOUSING and MASCOLL, ARTHUR and MURRELL, the we have DR LEO BREWSTER AND HIS GIRLFRIEND FROM THE ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT OF COASTAL, WATER AUTHORITY, QEH, SSA, URBAL and the 1, 2, 3 men, but trust me as the sun will rise tomorrow justice will be done in the fullnest of time.
Even the civil servants are coming out in the open and providing critical information on many former Ministers and happenings in their various Ministeries to them I say well done and thank you for your sense of honour and pride in your nation.
Wishing In Vain // July 5, 2008 at 12:20 PM
Urban
Justice // July 5, 2008 at 1:05 PM
I like Byer-Suckoo physically, but she seems an intellectual lightweight compared to Mia…that having been said, it might all be a matter of perception because Mia is all bombast and words…very little substance.
JC // July 5, 2008 at 1:46 PM
Justice and Scout if you all merge both of your comments together that is my perception exactly.
Ian Walcott // July 5, 2008 at 2:06 PM
One thing missing from the speculation…
Can Dr. Byer-Suckoo hold onto her seat?
It’s one of the hardest seats for the DLP to maintain and history has shown that they only win the seat when there’s a major swing.
As a minister with such a demanding portfolio…will she have the time to service her constituency…
Here’s the voting pattern of St. George South…(and remember that a lot of those voters are still alive or would have influenced their children to vote in a particular way)
2008 – Esther Byer-Suckoo
2003 – Louis Tull
1999 – Louis Tull
1994 – Louis Tull
1986 – Richard Byer
1981 – Louis Tull
1976 – Louis Tull
Negroman // July 5, 2008 at 2:08 PM
I supported the Democratic Labour Party and I will say this in no uncertain terms I WILL NOT VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRATIC LABOUR PARTY IF ESTHER BYER-SUCKOO EVER BECOME LEADER.No person of indian extraction will ever be the leader of Negroman in Barbados.I will pack my bags,pick up my family and head for a black state in Africa.No indian will ever lead me.
It is sad but it appears that the same lady is being groom to take over the leadership of the DLP.She is the most popular Minister and that is not by accident but by design.The influential and reactionary groups in Barbados have their strategy well thought out and Esther Byer-Suckoo is the key in that strategy.Listen to her words at the indian clelebration events recently.All good things were said about the indians good ethnics,strong family values and such like.I am very concern with high profile that Esther Byer-Suckoo has in Barbados now.
I will always remind the bloggers that the Democratic Labour Party is the only party in the history of Barbados that ran indian candidates.I will also continue to let let you all know that many indians are on many boards in Barbados and some are even chairmans.
Please follow these developments.
Justice // July 5, 2008 at 2:26 PM
Might I suggest Zimbabwe, Negroman?
Negroman // July 5, 2008 at 2:36 PM
Justice Zimbabwe will be a better place that future Barbados with Esther Byer-Suckoo at helm.I have no problem with Mugabe he is right.The black world needs more Mugabes to stand to the wicked and destructive white world.
More power to Mugabe.
We need leaders like Mugabe in the Caribbean
Press on Comrade Mugabe
Adrian Hinds // July 5, 2008 at 2:41 PM
Negroman // July 5, 2008 at 2:36 pm
Justice Zimbabwe will be a better place that future Barbados with Esther Byer-Suckoo at helm.I have no problem with Mugabe he is right.The black world needs more Mugabes to stand to the wicked and destructive white world.
More power to Mugabe.
We need leaders like Mugabe in the Caribbean
Press on Comrade Mugabe
=================================
Mugabe is right for whom?
Ian Walcott // July 5, 2008 at 3:14 PM
I had to go and take two phensics after reading Negroman’s posts…and I’m trying real hard to find some point of enlightenment…
Let me start by saying that I dont think Negroman is racist because there is nothing in his post to suggest that he feels superior to other races and this is how racism is defined…so we can rule out that…
What I do sense though is a very strong FEAR…which maybe justified in how he feels about how his Afro brothers and sisters are ‘apparently’ treated in Guyana at the hands of their Indo compatriots…
So in a sense he’s lashing out and his fear is that Indo-Guyanese migrating to Barbados are not leaving their prejudices (real or perceived) behind…
So we must rationalize his views within this context…and maybe it’s human to react this way…
However…if we go beyond the natural human reaction and step into the spiritual realm…then I’m sure that Negroman will agree that beneath race, color and gender we’re all God’s creation…
Now bringing it back to home…I’m sure Negroman has no problem with the growing number of Indo-Brits who vacation in Barbados, or even wealthy Indo-Trinidadians who visit our shores…because their foreign exchange helps the economy that his children benefit from…
I’m also sure that he has no problems with the Indians on Swan Street because they create employment for his black brothers and sisters…
So though his rage maybe justified…a little enlightenment maybe necessary…
Negroman maybe shocked to learn of the discrimination he’s likely to face when he returns to Africa…he may be surprised that he’s discriminated against because he’s a decendent of a slave…or he may not be black enough or pure enough…
He also has several choices of black countries to choose from, with their distinct set of problems which are today black-on-black inflicted…
This is in no way to negate Walter Rodney’s thesis on how Europe destabalized Africa…but certainly…our brothers and sisters on in the homeland must take responsibilty for some of their actions…
That being said…Negroman…remember that in life, the thing we fear the most…we will confront face to face…! That’s just how the universe works…
Dont replace hatred with hatred…replace it with love…learn from Martin Luther King and Obama!
Asiba-The Buffalo Soldier-still 2 much FAT on the road // July 5, 2008 at 3:42 PM
Embrace Rodney’s thesis
dont just mention it–while you are at it-please read Eric Williams
As I have stated already :COLONIALISM IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL–A-L-L of our problems
ALL -bar none
You name it and colonialism is responsible
Yes we need to do something about our situation but we have to recognise from whence we came. I AM SERIOUS
Negroman // July 5, 2008 at 3:51 PM
Ian Walcott, You are right I am not a racist in the context that I believe that one race is superior to another.However,I recognise that the black race is despise by all of the other races.That is a fact that CANNOT BE DISPUTED BY ANY ONE.We are not like or respected by any other race.This is a hard fact that we in the black race must accept.
The black race believes that we must assimilate and be dictated and control bu other races for progress to be made.We believe that the other races have our destiny in their hands.I have real problems with that line of thinking.Unfortunately many of our leaders because they are trained with a lot of eurocentric values they think and behave that way.In that context I say Mugabe is right.We as a people must chart our own course even if it means that suffering and sacrifices must be made.The europeans and North Americans did it through the wars in those regions.The millions of european lifes lost in their wars and in the process of colonising the world.The Confederation war in North American are cases in point.Sacrifices must be made for progress to be achieve.Therefore,if blacks in Zimbabwe and all other African states must go through a period of hardship ,sufferation and even death victory will be assure and Africa will be out of the clutches of colonists and neo colonist like some Asia countries especially China .
Ian Walcott my life is not gauge by any financial rewards that may come my way.I live very comfortably in Barbados at this moment.I am gainfully employ in a good job.However,I analyse all the other races I do not care if some are rich or poor.Wealthy indians that visit and live in Barbados have the same racist attiitude towards black people.I know of many cases of indians and Chinese businessmen racially abusing black workers in Bridgetown.I know of a particular case where an indian store owner in Tudor Street called out a white customer from a long line of black customers and proceeded to look after her.When I heard that story I made a promise that I will NEVER buy anything from that store.As a matter of fact I do not shop at any white,indian or chinese store or shop in Barbados.My money is spent at all black owned or control businesses.I am a very serious man when it comes to my race.If all right thinking black people could do that what a transformation in the economic & financial fortunes we could achieve.
The black race is the only race that make other races rich to oppress,illtreat,and destroy us.It is happening in Barbados.
Asiba-The Buffalo Soldier-still 2 much FAT on the road // July 5, 2008 at 3:51 PM
As a Crop-Over junkie, I am a bit concerned about the budget and the attendant debate coming off during Crop Over. Crop Over is the biggest thing after Xmas and for some people it is even bigger.
One must detract from the other or is it that one will make the other better.
Already we will lose the Larry Mayers/Admiral Nelson presentation of Festival Stage. Some of you might say -so what !!!
I dont know if Dennis Johnson and his lively Fireworks will be similarly affected by the CROP OVER BUDGET.
This is a rather strange situation-
budget during wuk-up season
Asiba-The Buffalo Soldier-still 2 much FAT on the road // July 5, 2008 at 3:55 PM
The black race is the only race that make other races rich to oppress,illtreat,and destroy us.It is happening in Barbados.
———————————->
This should be on a placard or Billboard somewhere in B’town.
or on a
The scout // July 5, 2008 at 4:53 PM
During my working years for big companies in b’dos, I saw how whites used to take blacks and use them to exploit their own. Just give them a bunch of keys and a little position and they gone wild. If they are intelligent enough and they move to middle management and gets a company car, most of them change their colour overnight and become more white than the white man himself. I’ve also seen many who were disgraced by the same whites over some simple mistakes, a good reason to take them down if they start to get too big for their boots. We in b’dos now have the wealthy whites, the local whites and the indians to deal with. If we don’t band together the days of serious exploitation will return. This indian race are more predudice than the white. Mark my words, they just have to get an opening and all hell brek loose
queen // July 5, 2008 at 5:34 PM
If the laws were adhered to, we would not have the problem of Indians here. the BLP for some reason felt the need to open our doors to the Guyanese, rich whites and who-so-ever will. we will see this serious rape of Barbados many years from now. As it is today, it is still in infancy but an overweight infant. We need the DLP to arrest this ugly development in Barbados and give this island back to its citizens. It frightens me to see so many Indians in the island, so many indians in business etc. Even the chinese are picking up the pace in setting up businesses here too. The ‘powers that be’ in Barbados somehow always make it easy (from my perception) for the whites, chinese and indians to have a comfortable life in Barbados but are hell bent on making sure the average Barbadian does not succeed. It is just like the during 1840s, blacks got their freedom but if they wanted to purchase land, it cost 10 times the amout that a white person would have paid for that same piece of land, they never got credit but the white man did etc, etc. This island is just repeating history and no one seems to want it to stop. If Esther Suckoo-Byer is slated against Mia well then, we would have to give careful thought to the pros and cons of this. I hope it does not happen. I admire Mia for her intelligence, I do not know her. nor do I know Esther, (she has a wonderful husband tho’). but as I personally see it, Barbados will either be led by a homo or a lesbian, so maybe Esther will be a nice change.
Sargeant // July 5, 2008 at 7:22 PM
I suppose South Africa is out of the question also now that some Chinese have been declared black.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7461099.stm
me // July 5, 2008 at 8:45 PM
lol poor we we get so caught up in the private lives of our leaders we forget what good they do…
John // July 6, 2008 at 1:33 AM
me // July 5, 2008 at 8:45 pm
lol poor we we get so caught up in the private lives of our leaders we forget what good they do…
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
.. and worse, we forget the power we have in our hands to force our leaders to do right by us.
Without us they are nothing!!
me // July 6, 2008 at 5:42 AM
Both Esther and Mia went to QC one became a lawyer and the other a doctor…MIa was always following the political path while Esther was an unknown quantity. I think based on experience and performance to date that Mia has shown that she can be a very effective Leader. Esther has simply appeared pretty while talking alot of nonsense ( so far).
Lets wait and see how Bajans really feel about ‘good hair.’
David // July 6, 2008 at 6:19 AM
In response to the approach by some who would want to compartmentalize how we as citizens should act in a society we found the following quote to be very appropriate. It is from the book Audacity of Hope by Barack Obama:
Adrian Hinds // July 6, 2008 at 6:43 AM
David that is socialism 101. It doesn’t work , and this is why Barack must never be elected in the US. :)
Me: what the does word effective mean to you? how are you using in reference to Mia? Wouldn’t there have been some legacy of effectiveness from Mia in the various lead roles she played in the last government?
David // July 6, 2008 at 6:56 AM
Adrian the quote must be part of a philosophy which he has know? Secondly we can ask what does work? What will work is the leader who can get people to behave in a way where there is relative peace and prosperity. We will only know this if Obama is allowed to try like Bush, Cheney et al were given the opportunity.
Adrian Hinds // July 6, 2008 at 7:11 AM
David // July 6, 2008 at 6:56 am
Adrian the quote must be part of a philosophy which he has know? Secondly we can ask what does work? What will work is the leader who can get people to behave in a way where there is relative peace and prosperity. We will only know this if Obama is allowed to try like Bush, Cheney et al were given the opportunity.
=================================
Bush and Cheney did what they had to do to protect this country, which is priority number 1 for their respective offices. The United States is about small government, about being left alone to your way of life, about raising yourself up by your bootstraps. I have left socialism in Barbados and the caribbean, I have seen first hand how it does not work. However there is a significant constituency of Americans who having been borned into the great welfare experiment of the 70’s seem to think that big government is the answer to their problems, and this is why the appeal of Obama is so huge. Like all socialist experiments, they will be in for great disappointment. No one can love you like yourself and the enticing sweet refrains of a government doing for you that which you no longer wish to do for yourself has many demonstrated practices in bad outcomes. Even if Americans are willing to risk a Obama presidentcy, and should he dive headlong into his socialist experiment, I cannot see it lasting very long. This is America.
David // July 6, 2008 at 7:15 AM
We respect your view Adrian. You obviously feel passionate about it. We feel that the US is about absolutes. Regarding your comment on big government again here is an absolute. Besides tax cutes to the rich and going to war whatelse recommends Bush.
aaah lets leave this argument for another time. We know it should be fun:-).
PS with the fall presidential election coming up we are sure we will get the time to lock horns!
Adrian Hinds // July 6, 2008 at 7:38 AM
Tax cuts to the rich is a euphemism. Tax cuts are given to people who pay taxes, and given the pay scales of today’s American middle class, what use to constitute rich no longer does. So it is not tax cuts to the rich, and those tax cuts worked. So you know the tax cuts were asked for by the President and pass into law by Congress. Also the war in Iraq to my mind was very necessary, the fact that the president lied (not to me I knew the rational for so doing) to get us their is immaterial to me, all Leaders must lie. The Tax cuts work and GW has been having some good foreign policy successes of late.
Even Barack is having a hard time sticking to the one thing that put him over Hillary amonst Democrats, His position of pulling out of Iraq in 16 months or by the end of 2009 which ever comes first.
David // July 6, 2008 at 8:31 AM
Adrian we don’t want to taint Yardbrooms excellent reflection by slugging it out with you :-). We promise or if a BU member obliges we will try to give our thoughts of the virtue of conservatism/absolutism (Bush/Cheney), liberalism (Obama) and the in between (BU)…:-).
@me
Dr. Byer-Suckoo we are told left school and studied to be a doctor. Instead of resorting to Bellville Avenue to become a fat cat she dropped her medical practice in rural St. George where here fees are known to be 50% of the going rate. Sometimes intellectual power as we define it is not the only prerequisite. In this lady we have a women who is leading from a populist base she has quietly developed. Time will tell if it can catapult her to the very top.
Anonymous // July 6, 2008 at 8:32 AM
Barack obama HAS NOT CHANGED HIS POSITION ON IRAQ.
All he has said which the bias media in the USA have twisted is that he will refine his policy based on the advice of his generals (re the number of brigades coming out per month for e.g.),but he is still very much committed to bringing the troops out in 16 months.
‘W e must be as careful coming out” as we were careless going in”. – Barack’s words.
Adrian Hinds // July 6, 2008 at 10:05 AM
Fair enough BU. I will stick to Yardie’s contributoin, but so you know, I have idea what conservatism and absolutism (whatever that is) has to do with the decisions real and publicize for going to war in Iraq. The president of US is mandate to protect this country from all enemies foriegn and domestic. Nothing in that declaration suggest pandering to Europeans and others, who the argument can be made is heavily invested in replacing America with themselves.
Anon: are you will to deny that Barack gave a time line for withdrawal from Iraq (16 months)?
…..are you going to deny that on last Thursday he said he would “refine” his policy on Iraq after visiting there later this summer and speaking with commanders?
why so immediate — and outraged — was the reaction in the Democratic blogosphere that Mr. Obama felt the need to go back before reporters later the same afternoon and insist his Iraq pledge had not changed.?
It would seems that i am not alone in finding difference between the two statements.
Sooner or later this neophyte will come to realize that the presidentcy does not control US foreign policy and that this office is not the place to bring about real and lasting change, compounded to this is the type of change he is invested in but is too scared to let America in on. He would not stand a chance if he did. Dammed socialist that he is. :)
Adrian Hinds // July 6, 2008 at 10:10 AM
Anyway back on topic. :) This idea of Sukoo being a counterpoint to Mia could very well be the approach of the Dems as Yardbroom suggest. It is the only logical explanation for her local stardom. However i question it’s usefulness as a real deterent to Mia becoming the PM of Barbados. Mia’s seat in Parliament is very secure, all she has to do is maintain her current hold on the leadership of the BLP and half the Battle is won.
David // July 6, 2008 at 10:28 AM
Hartley Henry’s prowess as a political strategist manifested itself in the general election just gone. Might we suggest that the basis upon which Byer-Sukoo is being pushed may have to do with what she and her ministry represent rather than a mano on mano approach? The success of the strategy may rely on Byer-Sukoo’s ability to deliver programs which embodies the popular view of the people. After all Prime Minister Thompson appears to be closer to a populist philosophy given his consensus approach.
If the DLP is successful is using government to shape a popular value system which is reflective of Barbadians we suspect this may run counter to what Mia represents. As leader of the BLP expected to state her position on the issues it will make for interesting prattle.
Ian Walcott // July 6, 2008 at 11:29 AM
@ Adrian Hinds…
Do you think that Dr. Byer Suckhoo’s seat is hard to maintain?
Wishing In Vain // July 6, 2008 at 12:04 PM
David I support your feelings on this issue, the truth of the matter is that the leadership of the DLP Gov’t is much closer to the heartbeat of the nation that the BLP were for most of their time in power.
The leader the Hon Mr David Thompson understands the need and the value of people playing their role in their destiny.
The DLP have positioned themselves very quickly as a caring considerate Gov’t who has support across all strata of society, they are many die hard BLP supporters who are now saying that the Prime Minister the Hon Mr . David Thompson has not put a foot wrong so far and are indeed supportive of his leadership style and manner to date.
With regard to the Minister Dr Esther Byer- Suckoo she has all the skill the brains and the wit to hold that seat as long as she cares to so long as she always remember how she got there and to continue to serve the people with destinction and humility, I will say for the people that she represents that they have indeed made a very sensible choice, when compared to an idiot Cupid, they have made a very progressive step forward.
Georgie Porgie // July 6, 2008 at 1:21 PM
The Ubiquitous & Omniscient Adrian Hinds opines
This idea of Sukoo being a counterpoint to Mia could very well be the approach of the Dems as Yardbroom suggest. It is the only logical explanation for her local stardom.
To say that it the ONLY LOGICAL explanation is to commit the fallacy of the unexcluded middle.
Mrs Suckoo need not become the leader of the DLP or the nation. She has already demonstrated what a lady is, and ought to be. She is being a role model to our young girls. She is pointing out that young girls can do well in school, get married according to the Biblical and social values that we hold, and yet have a place in public life.
This is “contra” or against or different to, or in contradistinction to a broad, loud mouth broad, who is a known homosexual and woman beater- all reprehensible and most unlady like behavior.
Mrs Sukoo being a counterpoint to “that thing” has nothing in my view to do with leadership of party or state.
Mrs Suckoo is a great contrast to the boisterous, brash, brawling broads which the BLP presented to the people in the persons of Liz Thompson and “that thing”. She is also a contrast to the brainless jackass that they chose from the Vault Road.
Georgie Porgie // July 6, 2008 at 1:32 PM
Mrs Suckoo’s exposure (or over-exposure to some) is saying
THIS IS WHAT A LADY LOOKS LIKE-not what is exhibited by “that thing”
THIS IS HOW A LADY BEHAVES-not what is exhibited by “that thing”
THIS IS THE IDEAL FOR YOUNG GIRLS-not what is exhibited by “that thing”
THIS IS HOW A LADY SPEAKS -not like how “that thing” speaks
Wishing In Vain // July 6, 2008 at 1:34 PM
Georgie Porgie
What you called mottley ??
You very correct in your description of the thing mottley.
What you omitted to touch on was his misservice in the various miniseries in which it worked.
Each one was a case of abuse of her position and in each it ended in her placement of females of her liking in positions for which they were unqualified thereby destroying the motivation of those that earned their positions.
Wishing In Vain // July 6, 2008 at 1:36 PM
The brainless jackass that they chose from the Vault Road??
You mean Forde the one with the son that kidnaps persons??
Georgie Porgie // July 6, 2008 at 1:55 PM
WIV
I know that Cinty aint too smart but I didnt know of the prowess of her son. Interesting.
You wrote with respect to “that thing”….
Each one was a case of abuse of her position and in each it ended in her placement of females of her liking in positions for which they were unqualified thereby destroying the motivation of those that earned their positions.”
Her placement of females also included the placement of she she’s or he she’s or she males or whatever into positions too. There were some strange “men” positioned as head”masters” of schools…..for example at St Leonards and St Michaels had some effeminate men apointed.
The BLP set the tone for the destruction of Barbados from 81-86. What they didnt finish then, they continued in 94-08.
The Dees not so wicked, but this crop are clueless.
Wishing In Vain // July 6, 2008 at 2:03 PM
Where does the one Ian Walcott fit into mottleys program is this a another mottley thing??
Reports reaching me are that she installed him in a job at cultural with a great salary???
Georgie Porgie // July 6, 2008 at 2:09 PM
LOL
WIV I dont know Mr Walcott. OK? LOL
Adrian Hinds // July 6, 2008 at 2:37 PM
David // July 6, 2008 at 10:28 am
Hartley Henry’s prowess as a political strategist manifested itself in the general election just gone. Might we suggest that the basis upon which Byer-Sukoo is being pushed may have to do with what she and her ministry represent rather than a mano on mano approach? The success of the strategy may rely on Byer-Sukoo’s ability to deliver programs which embodies the popular view of the people.
=================================
Fair enough, I can buy that argument, and don’t get me wrong Sukoo as the image of the DLP Magnifies the Image of Mia as the spoke person for the opposition. It brings everything about Mia “I am who I am” Mottley in such a sharp focus that it may very well explain her absense from the Media, and the apparent decision to issue press release instead. But at the end of day the people will vote out or validate a government, So inspite of the severe disadvantage a Sukoo media blitz presents to Mia, the DLP still has to deliver, to qualify for re-election.
…Thats why i keep saying to let the axe fall on the hacks. :)
Adrian Hinds // July 6, 2008 at 2:43 PM
Ian Walcott // July 6, 2008 at 11:29 am
@ Adrian Hinds…
Do you think that Dr. Byer Suckhoo’s seat is hard to maintain?
=================================
No i don’t think it is hard to maintain, I don’t think any seat in Barbados is difficult to maintain. Bajans have a very simple idea about representation that i am surprise there are not more safe seats base on personality. Anyway i does not matter to the DLP if Sukoo keeps here seat her image will continue to disadvantage Mia, in this parliamentary term. It only Thompy that has to prove himself as the PM, Mia has to prove herself as the LOTO, and she is not off to a very good start. But it is early days yet for both sides.
Adrian Hinds // July 6, 2008 at 2:56 PM
Georgie Porgie // July 6, 2008 at 1:21 pm
Mrs Suckoo need not become the leader of the DLP or the nation. She has already demonstrated what a lady is, and ought to be.
=================================
I wasn’t suggesting such. Remember there isn’t much votes that seperate the two parties. First past the post systems tend to erroneously magnify wins. There was a time leading up to the last elections when it was believe that the DLP’s strategy had seem to be one of winning by default, since it is accepted that Bajans vote out governments. If the BLP hacks are successful in painting an image of an effective DLP government per their manifesto promises and the people buy into this argument by 10,000 votes, who do you think will be the next PM?
….Let the axe fall on the Hacks.
Adrian Hinds // July 6, 2008 at 3:00 PM
Georgie Porgie // July 6, 2008 at 1:32 pm
Mrs Suckoo’s exposure (or over-exposure to some) is saying
THIS IS WHAT A LADY LOOKS LIKE-not what is exhibited by “that thing”
THIS IS HOW A LADY BEHAVES-not what is exhibited by “that thing”
THIS IS THE IDEAL FOR YOUNG GIRLS-not what is exhibited by “that thing”
THIS IS HOW A LADY SPEAKS -not like how “that thing” speaks
=================================
The people of St.Michael North East by their overwhelming support of Mia over the years have continue to reject your position. One constituent even went as far as to name her daughter after Mia. Child abuse? I think so but you get my drift. :)
Straight talk // July 6, 2008 at 5:53 PM
Adrian H:
Getting back off topic, why exactly is your adopted country occupying Iraq?
Your stooges have killed the president, disbanded all law and order, killed hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians, ruined the infrastructure of a whole nation and for what?
WMD?
American style democracy?
Defence against foreign enemies?
Please justify your president’s imperialistic ambitions as they relate to the United States’ Constitution.
We all await your considered response.
Georgie Porgie // July 6, 2008 at 6:21 PM
No I do not get your drift.
As far as I am concerned the issue is not about what the electors of St.Michael North East think. That has nothing to do with the exposure or over exposure of “that thing.”
If the electors of St.Michael North East vote for that thing for an eternity it might mean that the electors of St.Michael North East like “that thing” or prefer it to what ever candidate the opposition presents to the electorate.
It does not negate the fact that Mrs Suckoo looks like a lady, sounds like a lady and behaves like a lady, and that the behavior of “that thing” is disgusting and reprehensible. That is the single clear point that I sought to make, and made in perfect prose.
The fact that one constituent even went as far as to name her daughter after “that thing” is irrelevant and suggests to me, inter alia, that that constituent is of the same ilk! (Note I don’t use the word ONLY). Who knows she might have beaten her to do so, so I cant say only.
However, this does not negate that the image presented by Mrs Suckoo is that of a lady, whereas that of that thing is nothing like that of a lady and more like a yahoo, a wicker a beater and biter of women. Her character is abominable and disgusting and ungodly, and I can go on.
I did not say that you said that Mrs Suckoo need not become the leader of the DLP or the nation. I said that, and I added that Mrs Suckoo has already demonstrated what a lady is like , and ought to be like. Again my posts have said nothing about votes or elections or nothing of the like, nor am I hacking any one or for anyone. I am not interested either in what her political party or others might be doing strategy wise.I stated my position very clearly in perfect English, that anyone who understands English can understand.
Mrs Suckoo looks like a lady, speaks like a lady and behaves like a lady! Of this there is no doubt.
ROBOT // July 6, 2008 at 7:18 PM
i must say that the comments here in this thread
i find to be trite
-pure trite
ckeck this comment by GEORGIE PORGIE
—————————————–
The BLP set the tone for the destruction of Barbados from 81-86. What they didnt finish then, they continued in 94-08.
The Dees not so wicked, but this crop are clueless.
————————————————
THIS IS THE MOST ASININE STATEMENT EVER ON THIS BLOG——-REAL CRAP
boredickey // July 6, 2008 at 7:38 PM
Earlier in the year I said Dr.Suckoo will be the first FEmale Prime Minister of Barbados, and ME shot down the idea with the same question. I stand by my belief. However, the DLP government is only six months old. Pray tell me what family values Mia will bring to the table. She smokes like a big chimney; she needs to get married to a man and have a baby; Kerrie Simmons sounds more like Mia should sound and she more like he should sound when they speak. Mia also has the distinction of being the only Minister in the Caribean to have a whole prison, under her portfolio, burn down on her watch. Mia also wanted to curtail freedom of speech on these blogs and on talk shows. And I remember also during one of her submissions to Parliament about three years ago, she was pushing for gay rights to form part of a revised constitution for a Republic of Barbados. I think she is the perfect candidate to lead the BLP into the next or any future elections. It must be really emotionally hard on MIA when in Parliament she has to look at a real beauty queen speaking so eloquently and passionately on issues.And ME, Dr.Suckoo is a much better candidate for St.George south than stupid Cupid could ever be. She is our Queen! When you see her BOW! Stay tuned yah hear?
Georgie Porgie // July 6, 2008 at 8:37 PM
The Dees not so wicked, but this crop are clueless.
————————————————
THIS IS THE MOST ASININE STATEMENT EVER ON THIS BLOG——-REAL CRAP
Robot
First let me point out that I am neither Bee or Dee. But tell me as an example, what has this DLP administration done in Health in the six months they have been in office.
Adrian Hinds // July 6, 2008 at 8:55 PM
GP i gine left you to rant pun Mia. To say that i like is putting it very mildly. :)
BTW you like you got some time on your hands to be engaging ROBOT in a response to his shouting. ;)
Georgie Porgie // July 6, 2008 at 9:24 PM
No Adrian I dont have time with Robot. I appreciate that it is the thing for folk to have a PC and internet access. I just led him down the garden path, or down the wicket or up my alley (health matters.).
He can shout as loud as he likes, but he will look like an idiot if he dares to respond.
The Devil // July 6, 2008 at 9:43 PM
Is this the same Georgie Porgie who wrote so much about God and the love of Christ etc calling another human being “that thing”? Please don’t take this political mauvais langue to the point that it makes you look silly. Leave that for WIV.
me // July 7, 2008 at 6:29 AM
I am not so sure that is why she set her practice in St George but you can believe what you wish. I ma sure she makes alot of money either way. The rent in Blleville is quite a deterrent.
Still dont see that there is as yet a worthwhile comparison between the two. Etsher is a ‘pretty’ light weight!
David // July 7, 2008 at 6:36 AM
@me
We know that you understand the bigger point being made. We did say that we are not doing a mano on mano comparison but it was more an embodiment of certain values which some are suggesting might be juxtaposed later to support various arguments.