We know that you understand the bigger point being made. We did say that we are not doing a mano on mano comparison but it was more an embodiment of certain values which some are suggesting might be juxtaposed later to support various arguments.

Still dont see that there is as yet a worthwhile comparison between the two. Etsher is a ‘pretty’ light weight!

He can shout as loud as he likes, but he will look like an idiot if he dares to respond.

BTW you like you got some time on your hands to be engaging ROBOT in a response to his shouting. ;)

THIS IS THE MOST ASININE STATEMENT EVER ON THIS BLOG——-REAL CRAP

Robot

First let me point out that I am neither Bee or Dee. But tell me as an example, what has this DLP administration done in Health in the six months they have been in office.

-pure trite

ckeck this comment by GEORGIE PORGIE
—————————————–

The BLP set the tone for the destruction of Barbados from 81-86. What they didnt finish then, they continued in 94-08.

The Dees not so wicked, but this crop are clueless.
————————————————

THIS IS THE MOST ASININE STATEMENT EVER ON THIS BLOG——-REAL CRAP

As far as I am concerned the issue is not about what the electors of St.Michael North East think. That has nothing to do with the exposure or over exposure of “that thing.”

If the electors of St.Michael North East vote for that thing for an eternity it might mean that the electors of St.Michael North East like “that thing” or prefer it to what ever candidate the opposition presents to the electorate.

It does not negate the fact that Mrs Suckoo looks like a lady, sounds like a lady and behaves like a lady, and that the behavior of “that thing” is disgusting and reprehensible. That is the single clear point that I sought to make, and made in perfect prose.

The fact that one constituent even went as far as to name her daughter after “that thing” is irrelevant and suggests to me, inter alia, that that constituent is of the same ilk! (Note I don’t use the word ONLY). Who knows she might have beaten her to do so, so I cant say only.

However, this does not negate that the image presented by Mrs Suckoo is that of a lady, whereas that of that thing is nothing like that of a lady and more like a yahoo, a wicker a beater and biter of women. Her character is abominable and disgusting and ungodly, and I can go on.

I did not say that you said that Mrs Suckoo need not become the leader of the DLP or the nation. I said that, and I added that Mrs Suckoo has already demonstrated what a lady is like , and ought to be like. Again my posts have said nothing about votes or elections or nothing of the like, nor am I hacking any one or for anyone. I am not interested either in what her political party or others might be doing strategy wise.I stated my position very clearly in perfect English, that anyone who understands English can understand.

Mrs Suckoo looks like a lady, speaks like a lady and behaves like a lady! Of this there is no doubt.

Getting back off topic, why exactly is your adopted country occupying Iraq?

Your stooges have killed the president, disbanded all law and order, killed hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians, ruined the infrastructure of a whole nation and for what?

WMD?

American style democracy?

Defence against foreign enemies?

Please justify your president’s imperialistic ambitions as they relate to the United States’ Constitution.

We all await your considered response.

Mrs Suckoo’s exposure (or over-exposure to some) is saying

THIS IS WHAT A LADY LOOKS LIKE-not what is exhibited by “that thing”
THIS IS HOW A LADY BEHAVES-not what is exhibited by “that thing”
THIS IS THE IDEAL FOR YOUNG GIRLS-not what is exhibited by “that thing”

THIS IS HOW A LADY SPEAKS -not like how “that thing” speaks
=================================

The people of St.Michael North East by their overwhelming support of Mia over the years have continue to reject your position. One constituent even went as far as to name her daughter after Mia. Child abuse? I think so but you get my drift. :)

Mrs Suckoo need not become the leader of the DLP or the nation. She has already demonstrated what a lady is, and ought to be.

=================================

I wasn’t suggesting such. Remember there isn’t much votes that seperate the two parties. First past the post systems tend to erroneously magnify wins. There was a time leading up to the last elections when it was believe that the DLP’s strategy had seem to be one of winning by default, since it is accepted that Bajans vote out governments. If the BLP hacks are successful in painting an image of an effective DLP government per their manifesto promises and the people buy into this argument by 10,000 votes, who do you think will be the next PM?

….Let the axe fall on the Hacks.

@ Adrian Hinds…
Do you think that Dr. Byer Suckhoo’s seat is hard to maintain?
=================================

No i don’t think it is hard to maintain, I don’t think any seat in Barbados is difficult to maintain. Bajans have a very simple idea about representation that i am surprise there are not more safe seats base on personality. Anyway i does not matter to the DLP if Sukoo keeps here seat her image will continue to disadvantage Mia, in this parliamentary term. It only Thompy that has to prove himself as the PM, Mia has to prove herself as the LOTO, and she is not off to a very good start. But it is early days yet for both sides.

Hartley Henry’s prowess as a political strategist manifested itself in the general election just gone. Might we suggest that the basis upon which Byer-Sukoo is being pushed may have to do with what she and her ministry represent rather than a mano on mano approach? The success of the strategy may rely on Byer-Sukoo’s ability to deliver programs which embodies the popular view of the people.
=================================

Fair enough, I can buy that argument, and don’t get me wrong Sukoo as the image of the DLP Magnifies the Image of Mia as the spoke person for the opposition. It brings everything about Mia “I am who I am” Mottley in such a sharp focus that it may very well explain her absense from the Media, and the apparent decision to issue press release instead. But at the end of day the people will vote out or validate a government, So inspite of the severe disadvantage a Sukoo media blitz presents to Mia, the DLP still has to deliver, to qualify for re-election.

…Thats why i keep saying to let the axe fall on the hacks. :)

WIV I dont know Mr Walcott. OK? LOL

Reports reaching me are that she installed him in a job at cultural with a great salary???

I know that Cinty aint too smart but I didnt know of the prowess of her son. Interesting.

You wrote with respect to “that thing”….
Each one was a case of abuse of her position and in each it ended in her placement of females of her liking in positions for which they were unqualified thereby destroying the motivation of those that earned their positions.”

Her placement of females also included the placement of she she’s or he she’s or she males or whatever into positions too. There were some strange “men” positioned as head”masters” of schools…..for example at St Leonards and St Michaels had some effeminate men apointed.

The BLP set the tone for the destruction of Barbados from 81-86. What they didnt finish then, they continued in 94-08.

The Dees not so wicked, but this crop are clueless.

You mean Forde the one with the son that kidnaps persons??

What you called mottley ??

You very correct in your description of the thing mottley.

What you omitted to touch on was his misservice in the various miniseries in which it worked.

Each one was a case of abuse of her position and in each it ended in her placement of females of her liking in positions for which they were unqualified thereby destroying the motivation of those that earned their positions.

THIS IS WHAT A LADY LOOKS LIKE-not what is exhibited by “that thing”
THIS IS HOW A LADY BEHAVES-not what is exhibited by “that thing”
THIS IS THE IDEAL FOR YOUNG GIRLS-not what is exhibited by “that thing”

THIS IS HOW A LADY SPEAKS -not like how “that thing” speaks