Barbados Underground

Is A Moral Renaissance Or Integrity Legislation Required in Barbados Politics?

July 22, 2008 · 33 Comments

Submitted by Yardbroom

Events in recent years have led to the belief among some Barbadians, that all politicians are corrupt, dishonest and cannot be trusted. There are many, particularly the young who say quite openly, that Barbadian politicians have no regard for ordinary citizens, and are only interested in politics as a means to acquire great wealth. That some Barbadians feel this way is sad, but of particular concern is the number of young people who have this entrenched opinion.

To be fair, I have no evidence that the majority of Barbados politicians are dishonest and corrupt. However, in a small island supposedly secret transactions are not so for long, people do talk, and their friends have friends, what started off as a secret is soon common knowledge. The other problem is the display of ostentatious wealth. One can easily ask, how is it that someone who was recently so poor is now a man/woman of immense wealth. This does not mean the individual is dishonest or corrupt, but people think – sometimes without reasonable justification – even if they do not ask questions. The disappointing aspect of this scenario is the popular belief, that all people are corrupt and dishonest, politicians are only an extension of general society.

It is only the lack of opportunity which prevents these character traits from becoming manifest in all of us. Perhaps I am like a lone dog barking on the top of Cherry Tree Hill, but I do not subscribe to the popular view that all politicians are either dishonest or corrupt, and by extension the general public. Over time a climate has developed, in which previously honest people have been corrupted by a system that operates in Barbados. You might ask what is this system? Some people make it their business to surreptitiously corrupt politicians, who have control of the levers of power. They prey on a weakness for wealth and the desire for supposedly higher class social interaction. In a small society where all the main players are known to each other, and often have to interact on a professional basis outside politics.

The divisions between professional, social and political relationships can sometimes become blurred. As a result actions are taken which do not have the core of honesty that they should. There is a need for present day politicians to reclaim the trust of the people. There was a time when people became involved in politics in Barbados, because they genuinely wanted to help fellow Barbadians, Is this the case now? I will allow others to make that judgment. What I do know is that the attitude of former school head teachers in Barbados – a good model is the late Head Master of St Giles Boys School Mr. Cumberbatch – is sadly lacking in politics.

You do not have to be a multi-millionaire to have made a success of your life. There was a time when Head Masters in Barbados schools – perhaps they still do – took it upon themselves to treat their pupils as they would their own children. They wanted to inculcate in them manners and discipline, underpinned by the opportunity of a good education. Those head masters were not apart from society, they were a part of the whole, they were a significant part of it. Perhaps the morality we once had is gone never to return, but I do not believe all politicians are corrupt and dishonest, some just might be. However, among our sons and daughters there just might be a few who can tread that path of honesty and integrity free of corruption. It might be wise not to jettison “all” politicians there might just be a few nuggets of gold waiting to shine. Perhaps it might be “moral character” we need – in politics – even more than Integrity Legislation.

Categories: Barbados · Corruption · Governance · Politics · integrity legislation

33 responses so far ↓

  • Red Lake Lassie // July 22, 2008 at 8:25 PM

    Who of your “honest” politicians in the last government stood up and said “Enough!”

    Who of your honest politicians in the BLP government complained that there was no rule preventing government ministers from awarding contracts to wifes and sons?

    They kept their mouths shut every one.

    145 million on Kensington Oval, never to be used again and we don’t know who owns it!!!!

    If you swim with rats in a sewer, you too will stink.

  • ganong // July 22, 2008 at 8:40 PM

    I know a doctor who was fired from the Government service because he allegedly did not “touch ” the patients.

    He was fired by the same Liz Thompson who supervised the wastage of millions of dollars on a dump that has been dumped before being used once.

  • Wishing In Vain // July 22, 2008 at 8:51 PM

    I am still left to ask how was it possible on a Ministers salary that Blarney MM Lynch was able to purchase a million dollar home and then turn around and spend nearly as much on it to rennovate it to his standards.
    If we consider the favours granted to BNB by the gov’t of the day they then quickly hooked up and hired Lynch’s wife to give her a salary, what does that suggest you ??

    It suggest to me that Robert LeHunte is not as subtle and honest as he would like you to think that he is, he is known to cut deals with those in decision making positions, with a lot of goodwill being shown to that person that directs the work his way.

    Let us move on a little more where would Lynch have found the money to buy his NEW MERCEDES?

    After all the $60,000.00 that he stole from One Caribbean Media can really only now get him a nice Skoda and certain nowhere near a Mercedes as he has.

    In essence when we look back and see what the last lot amassed it is a shameful disgrace to our society, when Hallam Nicholls could state that he stopped counting when his wealth got to $ 25 million it makes me want to puke on them.

    Dodds open those gates we have some to come your way, sooner rather than later.

  • The scout // July 22, 2008 at 8:57 PM

    Some of us whether B or D would be better served if we look for some of the positive things that politicians do. The BLP did some stupid things especially over the last five years, but the way some diehard Dems talk, one would believe that Barbados became the worse place on earth under the Owen Arthur administration. Why must we be so blinded? The ironic thing is that eventually the B’s would be saying the same thing about the Dems in another five to ten years. It is because we don’t try to see the positive that we accuse every politician of corruption. Barbados has been blessed with a stable government whether B or D; yes there would be some misthrust but nothing to write home and tell your mother about. I hope we can mature to accept our leaders, it not an easy job. In the space of seven months P.M Thompson has gone grey and getting bald. That is PRESSURE.

  • ganong // July 22, 2008 at 10:27 PM

    @ The scout
    The problem we are having Sir is ascertaining some of the positive things that politicians do.

    Some times we can speak of things the parties do, but the contribution of some members is sometimes hard to determine.

    Whereas BOTH parties have done well at some time in the past, it is not hard to see or accept that especially in the last five years especially, the BLP under the Owen Arthur administration became the worse place on earth. And I am not a diehard Dem. My relatives are Bees!

    You don’t have to be blinded to see that. From 1981 – 1986 they had a practice run; but at that time they had some nobility in the party still. But in the last administration, ignorance and ineptitude gave way to downright greed and lawlessness.

    I really cant see how we can see the positive when we are exposed to negative. If you put BLUE litmus paper in a solution and it turns RED you know you have an acid.

    in like manner, when one observed some of the nonsense reported in recent times by BLP politicians we know there was some tiefing and corruption plane and simple. Even an idiot can figure that out.

    What Why must we be so blinded What?
    What It is because we don’t try to see the positive that we accuse every politician of corruption What?

    You write “ there would be some misthrust but nothing to write home and tell your mother about.”
    Are you just a big liar or
    are you drunk or
    don’t you understand the words you have used or
    all of the above?

    You write “In the space of seven months P.M Thompson has gone grey and getting bald. That is PRESSURE.” He got what he wanted, didn’t he? Let him lie in the bed in which he lied down.

  • John // July 22, 2008 at 11:03 PM

    A politician got up in parliament and make a racist statement as for example Patsy Springer did in a House of Assembly debate on ITAL back in 1975 as reported by Sanka Price.

    To hell with the constitution.

    It would be easy to label Patsy but what about the others who kept silent?

    Was there even one who took Patsy to task?

    Maybe there was one but I am not wasting my time going looking.

    Evil thrives when good men/women keep silent.

    It is the silence which implicates politicians and makes them guilty in our eyes.

    What is the position of any one of the politicians who know of Noel Lynch’s performance on VOB?

    Perhaps the Dees raised hell over the elections, but now they are in ………

    …….. not one of the MPs has a position that I can remember, so I assume all support their brother.

    SILENCE DENOTES CONSENT.

    Sometimes you can talk too much, but sometimes you need to say and do things that leave an observer in no doubt as to the principles which guide you.

  • BWWR // July 23, 2008 at 3:31 AM

    Recently, while I was in the UK visiting my son, I was taken to visit the British House of Commons. While there, I was introduced to a member of the House. We chatted for a long time and what, more than anything, struck me was one of their remarks about Tony Blair, and I paraphrase. “Tony did a very good job, you know. Unfortunately, all anyone will remember is Iraq.” I, a non-British, outside-observer, had to agree.

    Extending that to Barbados, therefore, does anyone remember the last days of Sandiford with the IMF camped just downstairs from his office? Then Owen Arthur came along and in very large measure rectified the situation. He was then our saviour. But, as always happens with politicians, he encountered his “Iraqs”. So too will David Thompson. Face it.

    In the old days, people went into politics to serve the nation. Not so today. Grantley Adams was not a rich man. Nor was Winston Churchill. However, politics has made Sandiford and Arthur – and Tony Blair – VERY rich. This is not a reverseable trend. Instead, political office has become a high-paying, short-duration profession. Sort of “Make hay while the sun shines.” Like CEOs of large corporations with their multi-million dollar golden handshakes.

    In the old days the requirement that elections be held every so many years, would suffice to keep politicians in line. Not today. What worked in the old days does not work today. Big business will pay enormous political contributions to keep any party (or candidate) it favours in office. Thus, politics, like advertising, is BIG BUSINESS.

    Is there a need for integrity legislation? You bet there is. In fact, it is now absolutely vital. We, the general populace, must now police the politicians. However, while we move to pressure the government (any government) to put that in place, let us not blind ourselves to the good things that that government (any government) accomplishes. In other words, credit where it is due.

    Personally, I have never been in favour of any political party holding office for longer than two terms. It leads to arrogance and complacency. As it did with Blair – and Arthur. As it will do, if he lasts that long, with Thompson. And ALL of them need the assistance of integrity legislation whereby if they breach those laws, their backsides end up in Dodds along with all the other criminals.

    And where does this trend come from? It comes directly from the most influential power of our time, a country in which the almighty dollar has always been its god and where even judges rely for their offices on their political skills (read: “campaign contributions from big business”) rather than their skills in jurisprudence. No prizes for guessing which country I am speaking of. It is a worldwide trend, like Coca Cola, started by this nation. And it is not going away. Therefore, we in Barbados have to take measures to ensure that integrity is maintained and things like presidential pardons are not available to prevent stays for politicians as guests of HM the Queen at Dodds if they do not act with scrupulous honesy and integrity.

  • The scout // July 23, 2008 at 4:19 AM

    ganong
    I would not be so naive to believe that the last administration didn’t overindulge themselves but we’re to be blamed. Any party whether B or D should get a maximum of ten years in office unless there is a drastic change in the party make-up. What happened with the Bee’s will happen with the Dems if we allow it. The point is, when we look at the level of corruption administered in other countries even within the Caribbean, we have not feared too badly. If we did we would long have been in the same state or worse than them. Without any natural resources, we can hold our heads high and be the envy of the region, simply because of good management over the years. That’s what has made us such proud people; that’s why bajans are disliked within the region; that’s why people are flocking here looking for a better life; that’s why we must preserve what we’ve strived so hard for. I salute any staesman who has taken up the mantel of government to keep this country stable. Whether is was Mr Thompson or some-one else, their hair would have gone grey and balding too. Check Sir LLoyd. Owen Arthur, both in recent years, they both started with black hair and finished with grey. Let us appreciate our leaders, they are not angels but they are among the best of the evil ones.

  • The scout // July 23, 2008 at 4:27 AM

    BWWR
    You have spoken a mouth full. I totally agree with you.

  • neil // July 23, 2008 at 5:11 AM

    > Yardbroom: “To be fair, I have no evidence that the majority of Barbados politicians are dishonest and corrupt.”

    In fact I would be willing to bet that the majority of politicians in Barbados (and most democracies for that matter) are honest and value public service above personal privilege…

    > BWWR: “In the old days, people went into politics to serve the nation.”

    …And I think most modern politicians also go into politics to serve the nation.

    > Yardbroom: Is a Moral Renaissance Or Integrity Legislation Required in Barbados Politics?

    But even though I believe most politicians to be honest and upstanding that has no bearing on whether we need integrity legislation.

    To paraphrase one scholar, the problem is not ‘how do we get morally upright politicians?’; rather the important question is ‘regardless of whether politicians are morally upright or not, how do we keep them in check?’

    In the long run we solve problems of integrity, not by hoping for a renaissance that will give us morally upright leaders, but by devising proper institutional and legal frameworks.

  • Anonymous // July 23, 2008 at 6:45 AM

    BWWR

    Please defend owen arthur all day and all long if you like but please don’t throw in innocent good decent men along with corrupt tiefin arthur to give credence to your point.

    Sir lloyd erskine Sandiford whatever his faults were – was an honest ,decent man who put barbados first.

    None,and I mean no one could say that – that man recieved bribes,gave out contrats to his frinds and family for kickbacks or left office ‘very rich’ – as you have said.

    Owen arthur did not have his ‘littke Iraqs’ – owen arthur was a brazen, shameless thief, and a very,very corrupt person – the likes of which barbados has never seen in any prime minister before – and I hope never to see in any prime minister to come.

    His failed economic policies brought no relief to the people of barbados but only hardship – for example:

    – selling our limited resources – land to the highest bidder,as well as selling off others like our bank,insurance company – entities which were prospering at the time of sale

    - the policy of borrowing over and above what was prudent and leaving a huge debt for generations to come

    - squandering the reserves left by the sandiford administration – reserves which came about through much sacrifice especially by the civil servants

    - allowing cost over runs in hundreds of millions of dollar for a small economy such as ours -simply so he and his party people and ministers could ALL get rich – who did not get rich then -did not want to be rich.

    Jail time is required Mr Thompson.

    Finally I will not judge mr thompson based on owen arthur’s past track record – he has only been in for about 7 months – and therefore he has the opportunity to depart from the corrupt model left by owen.

    The choice is his – but until then he should not be prejudged.

  • David // July 23, 2008 at 6:57 AM

    Against the background that the current government is currently examining what is the correct configuration for the implementation of integrity legislation (ITAL) it might be useful to discuss how we can keep our politicians and other public officials in ‘check’ while in office. There is no doubt that many of our politicians begin the journey with a thirst to serve but along they way they ’speed wobble’ and may suffer a fall.

    Our concern is that in the Caribbean because of our small size and the probability that we are all connected by blood in some way, any onerous structure which is placed on our existing culture of governance may backfire. While we support any measure that will support transparency in governance we urge the government and those involved in the process of the policy development to thread cautiously.

  • Global Voices Online » Barbados: Honest Politicians? // July 23, 2008 at 7:01 AM

    [...] is a need for present day politicians to reclaim the trust of the people”: Barbados Underground wonders whether “it might be ‘moral character' we need – in politics – even more [...]

  • Anonymous // July 23, 2008 at 7:14 AM

    Anonymous

    you are a brazen liar.

    Our foreign reserves have never been higher. Our unemployment has never been lower. What large portions of land did the Government of Barbados sell? Why is Thompson going to sell the Government’s shares in BNB and ICB? Ministers being rich? Who and how much? Bring facts, you are on a blog anonymously so you need not fear being sued.

    Did 15,000 marching up and down, because life was good?

    The Dems don’t even send personal invitations to Sandiford to attend events at George Street, he has even complained about such!

  • David // July 23, 2008 at 7:21 AM

    As usual we are allowing narrow partisan political interest to derail what has the potential to be a good discussion. Here is what the Prime Minister had to say on the matter. We should note that there is a logical reason put forward which we should challenge if we disagree. We should note however that while the government will try to divest the opportunity is there AGAIN for Barbadians and Barbadians entities to buy the shares. In other words the ownership of the shares will move from central government to ordinary Barbadians.

    Please let us debate the issues in a way that would make the late and great Errol Barrow proud. Here is the relevant snippet from the budget debate by Prime Minister Thompson:

    The Barbados Government owns a substantial number of shares in
    both the Barbados National Bank and the Insurance Corporation of
    Barbados, but in both companies, the Government is a minority
    shareholder, and so is in no real position to direct the strategy of
    either company.

    At the same time, Government has been advised that the value of its
    shareholding in those two companies is approximately $200 million
    and that the rate of the cash dividend that Government receives on
    an annual basis on these shares is less than the rate of interest that
    Government pays on its borrowing.

    Since these shares are no longer useful in determining the strategic
    direction of either of these companies, Government has taken the
    decision to offer these shares firstly to Barbadian individuals, the
    National Insurance Board and local companies and then, if necessary,
    to the current majority shareholders of the two companies, if
    Barbadians do not take up all of the shares.

  • Anonymous // July 23, 2008 at 7:41 AM

    Why did Sandiford sell BET to C&W? What was Arthur’s reasons for selling the majority shareholding in BNB and ICB? Post that as well if we want a balanced debate! For the record I did not ascribe any wicked motive to Thompson’s proposed sale of the shares. But after the statement by the PM, which ordinary Barbadian will buy those shares?

    The article by Yardbroom is just a lot of confused froth which contributes little to the issue of ITAL. The present Government has stated that it intends to institute such, the question is when and in what form it will take.

  • The scout // July 23, 2008 at 7:45 AM

    Ya know, that’s what has endeared me to Barrack Obama. He’s not taking sides with blacks or white, hispanics or anyother. I’ll like to see us bajans mature to the stage where we give praise where it is due and criticism where it is due. i was once partisan blind but as I matured I was able to think for myself, I still have my political bias but I can now accept or reject matters from any party. Over time I’ve also recognised that ALL politician are either good friends or have a healthy working relationship. I hope this continues; this is what keeps barbados’sgovernment stable. God bless barbados and their leaders.

  • Straight talk // July 23, 2008 at 8:00 AM

    I think the PM is making a sound move, and my advice to any fellow Barbadians in the same position is to get out of the stock market…. fast, while you still can.

    If you do liquidise your assets don’t leave it as cash in the bank, spend and invest wisely in goods that will have utility in the coming months.

    Just my two cents.
    I am not a Financial Advisor. IANAFA.

  • Tony Hall // July 23, 2008 at 9:13 AM

    “However, politics has made Sandiford and Arthur – and Tony Blair – VERY rich.:

    BWWR,
    Are you really serious about the above comment you made in respect to Sir Lloyd? Come on. Sir Lloyd might have done some things which Barbadians did not favour but to lump him with Owen Arthur and infer that he is rich and became so through dubious means is hypocritical.

  • John // July 23, 2008 at 10:19 AM

    Straight talk // July 23, 2008 at 8:00 am

    I think the PM is making a sound move, and my advice to any fellow Barbadians in the same position is to get out of the stock market…. fast, while you still can.

    If you do liquidise your assets don’t leave it as cash in the bank, spend and invest wisely in goods that will have utility in the coming months.

    Just my two cents.
    I am not a Financial Advisor. IANAFA.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    I know a Financial Advisor fellow who says the same thing.

    He leaves it up to the individual but plainly states there is no way he will put his money into shares in a Bajan company, … no way in hades.

  • Bajantease // July 23, 2008 at 11:31 AM

    Anonymous // July 23, 2008 at 6:45 am

    In the lead up to Jan 15, I do not recall any marching to get a party out of power, I don’t recall large numbers being fired and sent home, I don’t recall the infamous 10% cut.. that was under the DLP. Under sandi and Thompson.

    You and others appear to forget the nashing of teeth and riping of clothes during that period.

    Where were the tears prior to Jan 15?

    People like dirt and love to roll in it hence the current joy at the BLP loss and the pointing of fingers. the firing of people from positions (NOT those that are clearly political) to make way for your own chums, when these people have performed well in the interest of B’dos.

    Like the blood thirsty romans you want the entertainment of blood spilled, not the reason nor the need.

    Under the former Adminstration much good progress has happened in this country and to its people locally, regionally and internationally. Progress we can feel and see and yet much more that cannot be tangibly seen. Indeed as has happened in the much then hated Sandiford administration. But this is the nature of blood politics.

    Mr Thompson has made a very good point.. the people want to know how much you entered gov’t with not how much you left with.. WE WANT TO KNOW HOW MUCH THE MEMBERS OF THE DLP, the GOVERNMENT AND the OPPOSITION have NOW ENTERED GOVERMENT with.

    Contracts are about to be signed, consultants are being appointed, Not a single member of the DLP has come forward. Shall they be given time to grab all they can? Shall they be given time to set up all those special accounts? Shall they be given time to appoint their own friends and family to key positions and get money and gov’t contracts?

    Is this what we want as a people going forward?
    Promises are a comfort to a fool, the new administration needs to be held to the promises which were made.. so we can avoid the mistakes made before and move this country and the people forward.

  • Bajantease // July 23, 2008 at 12:00 PM

    John

    The local stock market has traditionally not been greatlly impact on by external factors thats a fact. So I’d say now is the time to invest foriegn funds at home in a stable market. Small gains but no big losses really.

    Coming into the market lloking only at the dividends is short sighted.. I think you should be looking at share price appreciation to sell, make profit and then reinvest wait again.. really 4-10c on every share is no real reason to get in the market I think.

    But I’m no Financial Advisor

    The offer of shares to the small man is junk, if he either wasn’t interested or couldn’t afford to buy at 1.80, he’s not going to now at $6.50. The middle class would try but can he ? with higher fuel, business, services, fee costs etc. They have been squeezed out of that market.. its over to the big boys then. Arrangements such as discounted share prices, tax deductions would have to be made to enable people to buy. Offer them to Credit unions.

  • The scout // July 23, 2008 at 12:47 PM

    In the end people like Cow, Bizzy and Leroy Parris will purchase those shares. Aren’t they LOCALS. Remember, they are locals and they are LOCALS

  • Barnabas Collins // July 23, 2008 at 12:51 PM

    First before I start my discussion, diehards don’t get political parties elected. It is the people who can have independent thought who get people elected. This discussion started really well but it has gone into name calling of all of our leaders. The reason why we are not like MOST other caribbean countries is that our political parties are fundamentally the same irrespective of what some on this and other blogs may try to intimate. It is why we have some continuity in projects and if not philosophy. It is why we are so develop. It is why no political party will EVER make our people pay for education. It is why no political party will devalue our dollar.

    Folks this is what I can tell you as fact. I happen to be a government worker under both parties and both parties ensure that people that supported their party got government work and then anyone else later. It happened under DLP government between 1986 – 1994 and it happened from 1994 – 2007 AND it will happen with this government as well.

    Imagine we have people here cussing the BLP administration, it was the axis of evil YET Clico (Rayside), COW williams and Arthur Construction had work on the (cost overuns) highway. My point is that although there are some issues that would make you go hmmm (I am not suggesting that we should condone them), I think inherently our politicians want to help the country but if they find way to help us and themselves most of them will take it. I remember in 1986, we hailed the government as we are now as the saviours and then by 1994, we all wanted to castrate the Sandiford administration. And it will happen with this government too, just give it some time. The love affair will end in divorce.

    Finally I think that the article that started this discussion was fairly well written and thought out, more than I can say for some of the subsequent posts, but it is one of the better discussions to have as Barbadians.

    BC

  • The scout // July 23, 2008 at 2:27 PM

    Barnabas Collins
    This was going on from the time I knew about politics and this would continue. That’s what I want bloggers to understand. Every election never mind the amount of seats any party gets, the percentage difference between the two parties is in single digits. I’ve come to the realisation that the politicians are running a relay and just pass on the baton for the other party to run with for a while and get some sweets for them and their followers. the good thing is that very little except for some position switching changes; life goes on as usual. That’s what keeps us so stable.

  • John // July 23, 2008 at 2:28 PM

    …. Trade Confirmers, The Cotton Factory, Plantations Limited etc. inform my thinking and would if I were a small man, a member of the middle class or a big maguffie ….. (depending how big).

    It is a matter of trust.

  • 22 // July 23, 2008 at 2:32 PM

    I refuse to be categorized as a B or D.

    With that said it sickens me to see the some of the respondents lashing out and calling some of our former leaders names, especially those calling Owen Arthur a ‘theif’.

    I may be young but I was raised to respect people no matter what. These people worked hard for our country so respect what they did and leave your nasty biases out of it. You do not know the full story about any politician and their decisions so why not just keep your mouth shut and stop looking like an ingnorant fool.

  • 22 // July 23, 2008 at 2:36 PM

    correction: to see some of the respondents

  • The scout // July 23, 2008 at 2:58 PM

    Most of these bloggers are educated enough that they can release the shackles off their biased minds and think like matured individuals. That would not stop you from having a soft spot for any party but you will deserve the right to call a spade a spade. i have moved to that level and I feel at peace with myself. Once I used to say things that caused a conflict between my mind and me. NO MORE, it’s now all in unison.

  • John // July 23, 2008 at 3:13 PM

    The scout // July 23, 2008 at 2:58 pm

    Once I used to say things that caused a conflict between my mind and me. NO MORE, it’s now all in unison.
    +++++++++++++++++++++++

    I used to just keep quiet and watch foolishness happen. That way I didn’t experience the conflict of which you speak.

    … but I experienced a worse conflict.

    I took me a while to get to the place you describe but all humans have it in them to get there too.

    It is a great feeling.

  • Kay // July 23, 2008 at 3:17 PM

    The Scout
    Tennyson said it best.
    “the old order changeth
    yielding place to new
    and God fulfills himself in many ways
    lest one good custom should corrupt a world”
    or something like that.

  • Carlos // July 23, 2008 at 8:04 PM

    ‘Is a Moral Renaissance Or Integrity Legislation Required in Barbados Politics?’
    _________________________________
    ‘The disappointing aspect of this scenario is the popular belief, that ALL people are corrupt and dishonest, politicians are only an extension of general society’ emphasis added.

    While this discussion essentially focuses on our Politicians, who ‘…are only an extension of general society…’ our wider society, are also in a mess, either to a greater or lesser extent, morally, ethically, etc, etc., all of which emanate from our ‘SPIRITUAL’ condition, called ‘SIN’ from which absolutely none of us are exempt!

    Let all of us hear from God’s Word, on the matter.

    “The heart is DECEITFUL above ALL things, And DESPERATELY wicked; who can know it? (Only God). Jer. 17:9. emphasis added.

    “But we are ALL like an unclean thing. And ALL our righteousness, (good works & deeds) are like FILTHY RAGS; We ALL fade as a leaf. And our iniquities, like a wind, have taken us away.’ (Isa. 64: 6). emphasis added.

    Mankind, throughtout the world, are in the worst crisis of history, and this ironically, comes at the time when we have made the greatest progress in every area of endeavor, education, science, technology, etc, etc, BUT, we are still unable to find a cure for ‘SIN’ which CANNOT be educated away, or legislated away, because there is still ONLY one remedy for it, JESUS CHRIST, and His Atoning blood, which can only be appropriated by, sincere REPENTANCE to God our Father, and Faith and Trust in His Son, Christ Jesus; nonthing else will work.

    “Unless the Lord build the house (nation), they labour in vain who build it (BLP or DLP!). Unless the Lord guards the city, The watchman stays awake in vain.” (Psa. 127:1) emphasis added.

    The worst economic/financial crisis in history, throughout the countries of the world, is unfolding daily, before our eyes and lives; this is essentially because of the greed, avariciousness, and corruption of the wealthy, who don’t care anything about the poor and destitute.

    Be warned, Barbados, we are NOT exempt from the Righteous judgment of Almighty God, our turn is coming, IF, we don’t REPENT, all of us, as SIN knows no colour, class, nor creed.

    This is no such thing as ‘poor’ sin, or ‘rich’ sin, ” For ALL have sinned, and fall short of the glory of God.” (Rom. 3:23) “For the wages (penalty) of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.” (Rom. 6:23).

  • The scout // July 24, 2008 at 7:55 AM

    Carlos
    AAAAAAMMMMEEEEEENNNNNN. Blessings to you

Leave a Comment