Submitted by Yardbroom
The late great American writer Walter Lippmann said:
“The journalist’s role was to inform the public of what the elite’s were doing. It was also to act as a watchdog over the elites, as the public had the final say with their votes”.
Within the above framework, ” journalism’s first obligation is to tell the truth”.
Why should journalists inform us: ” because an informed public is the only one that can correctly assess whether the society it inhabits is going off the rails”.
Perhaps I should say at the outset, this article has no political polemic, it is not for or against the BLP or DLP. This should not be necessary, but regrettably a few of us, see every discourse through a narrow focus of political allegiance.
I put it to you, that a few too many of the major decisions, which have been taken in Barbados recently, were to the disadvantage of its citizens; and they possibly would not have been taken, had the electorate been better informed. There was not the rigorous examination of proposals in the News Media, one would expect. A couple projects, costing many millions of dollars were not properly examined, and because it was expedient not to “analyse” but to quietly “report” on what had been agreed, the almost empty cupboard, spewed out dollars with a haste that bordered on the obscene.
To be blunt the public were not “informed”, in the journalistic sense.
Without rigorous examination, journalists acquiesced to what history had taught them was a fait accompli. The public accustomed to no more, accepted what they saw, as the engine turned in the background spewing tax payers dollars to the wind.
















